Lawyer's Beliefs, Perceptions and Ability to Detect the Deception of Child Witnesses

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Saykaly ◽  
Victoria Talwar
Keyword(s):  
Child Witnesses

Mock Juror Perceptions of Child Witnesses on the Autism Spectrum

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Henry ◽  
Rachel Wilcock ◽  
Wing Chui ◽  
Carmen Marti-Sanchez ◽  
Laura Crane
Keyword(s):  
Mock Juror ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Child Witnesses ◽  
Juror Perceptions

She Just Didn't Act Like She Was Abused & Jurors' Behavioral Expectations of Child Witnesses

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari A. Hale ◽  
Daniel Ardeshir Ravanshenas ◽  
Eric Neal ◽  
Tiffani Cornaggia ◽  
Bradley D. McAuliff
Keyword(s):  
Child Witnesses ◽  
Behavioral Expectations

Attorneys' strategies when questioning child witnesses about numerosity in court

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Wandrey ◽  
Thomas Daniel Lyon ◽  
Jennifer Mascia ◽  
Jodi A. Quas
Keyword(s):  
Child Witnesses

‘[Expletive], that was confusing, wasn’t it?’ Defence lawyers’ and intermediaries’ assessment of the language used to question a child witness

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Hanna ◽  
Emily Henderson
Keyword(s):  
Developmentally Appropriate ◽  
Child Witnesses ◽  
Child Witness ◽  
Legal Professionals ◽  
Language Problems ◽  
Trial Transcript ◽  
Common Understanding

While language specialists and legal professionals have voiced concerns about the language used to question child witnesses in the Aotearoa/NZ courts, it is unclear whether both groups share a common understanding of what those language problems are. This study compares five Aotearoa/NZ defence lawyers’ and two England/Wales intermediaries’ perceptions of the developmental (in)appropriateness of the language used to question an 11-year-old witness, based on their assessment of the witness’ anonymised trial transcript. The comparison showed that both groups agreed on the categories of language features that might confuse children, however, intermediaries identified many more instances of problematic language within those categories than lawyers. Training on developmentally appropriate language and pre-trial preparation of questions would certainly help lawyers improve the comprehensibility of their questions. However, the implementation of a full intermediary scheme, such as that in England/Wales, probably offers the best prospects for a sustained sea change in questioning practices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document