Issues in Portfolio Assessment: The Scorability of Narrative Collections

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Novak ◽  
Joan L. Herman ◽  
Maryl Gearhart
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Assessment

MANAJEMEN PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK INTEGRATIF SESUAI KURIKULUM 2013 PADA KELAS 4 SD KHADIJAH SURABAYA

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nafiah Nafiah
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Primary School ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Lesson Plan ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Authentic Assessment ◽  
Project Assessment ◽  
Written Assessment ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Thematic Learning

The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation of management of integrative thematic learning based on curriculum 2013 at grade 4 khadijah primary school Surabaya. The focus of this study are 1. The lesson plan for integrative thematic class based on curriculum 2013 at grade 4 khadijah primary school . the research method of this study is descriptive kualitatif, the data collection technique are interview, observation and documentation. The result of this study are 1) the lesson plan of integrative thematic based on curriculum 2013 at grade 4 khadijah primary school Surabaya conducted by several steps are : a) set thema, b) doing analisys SKL, KI, and basic competence, c) arrage syllabus, d) arrage the lesson plan, 2) doing integrative thematic learning based on curriculum 2013 at grade 4 Khadijah primary school used scientific approch by observing, questioning, reasoning, trying, processing, displaying, verivicaying, and communicating, 3) the assessment of integrative thematic learning based on curriculum 2013 at grade 4 khadijah primary school used authentic assessment that include written assessment, project assessment and portfolio assessment.

scholarly journals EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training: a EULAR School of Rheumatology initiative

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001684
Author(s):  
Marloes van Onna ◽  
Sofia Ramiro ◽  
Catherine Haines ◽  
Mette Holland-Fischer ◽  
Jose Antonio Pereira da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personal Development ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Multisource Feedback ◽  
Reflective Writing ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Curriculum Vitae ◽  
Personal Reflections

ObjectiveAbout half of the rheumatology trainees do not use a portfolio. This project was established to reach consensus about the content of a EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training and subsequently develop portfolio assessment forms.MethodsAfter establishing a portfolio working group (WG), including nine rheumatologists and one educationalist, a systematic literature review (SLR) on the content and structure of portfolios for postgraduate learning was conducted (November 2018). This was followed by a survey among WG members and members of the EMerging EUlar NETwork, inquiring about the content and structure of existing national portfolios. The portfolio WG selected the key components of the portfolio, taking previous experience and feasibility into account. Assessment forms (eg, case-based discussion) were developed and pilot-tested.Results13/2034 articles were included in the SLR (12 high/1 moderate risk of bias). Information on procedural skills, personal reflections, learning goals and multisource feedback was most often included a portfolio. Twenty-five respondents completed the survey (response≈50%). Feedback from assessors, reflective writing and formulation of learning goals were considered important dimensions to be covered in a portfolio. Six key components of the portfolio were established: curriculum vitae, personal development plan, clinical work, professional behaviours, education and research activities. Suggested minimal content for each component was formulated. Four assessment forms were successfully pilot-tested by 11 rheumatologists and their trainees.ConclusionA EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training and assessment forms were developed. Portfolio implementation, particularly in countries without an existing portfolio, may promote a higher standard of rheumatology training across Europe.

scholarly journals The Use of Portfolio Assessment in English Writing Classes

2020 ◽  
Vol 485 ◽  
pp. 012093
Author(s):  
R F A Hudori ◽  
Z Tasnim ◽  
A E Fardhani ◽  
D P Sari
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Writing Classes ◽  
English Writing

Primary Teacher Conceptions of Giftedness: Image, Evidence, and Nonevidence

1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane C. Rohrer
Keyword(s):  
Single Case ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Qualitative Difference ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Primary Teacher ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Teacher Interviews ◽  
Secondary Sources

This qualitative multisite single case study is designed to explore the conception of giftedness held by four experienced teachers. These teachers were from three school districts piloting the Early Assessment for Exceptional Potential portfolio assessment model (Shaklee, Barbour, Ambrose, Viechnicki, & Rohrer, 1991). Teacher interviews triangulated by multiple secondary sources were analyzed to answer the research question guiding the study: How do primary teachers conceptualize giftedness in young children! Findings revealed that the four teachers shared a similar image of giftedness. This conception had two dimensions: classroom performance and affective style of the students. Teachers assessed children developmentally against their peers for extremely unusual intellectual and/or academic ability as demonstrated by what children said and did, and a “spark, ” or qualitative difference in these children characterized by intensity, high visibility, and/or uniqueness. Four strands of evidence created the teachers' image of child potential.

How professionals view portfolio assessment

1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry L. Johns ◽  
Peggy Van Leirsburg
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document