New Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Addresses Warrants for Tracking Devices

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e601072007-004 ◽

2007 ◽

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Tracking Devices ◽

Federal Rule

Download Full-text

A Formulaic Recitation Will Not Do: Why, as a Matter of Law, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(c) Should Be Interpreted to Be at Least as Stringent as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.3588398 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Charles Hintz

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Civil Procedure ◽

Federal Rule

Download Full-text

Is the Shrink's Role Shrinking? The Ambiguity of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2 Concerning Government Psychiatric Testimony in Negativing Cases

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.2888681 ◽

1999 ◽

Author(s):

R. Gregory Cochran

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Federal Rule

Download Full-text

Proposed Amendments to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32

Federal Sentencing Reporter ◽

10.2307/20639107 ◽

1989 ◽

Vol 1 (7) ◽

pp. 351-353

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Federal Rule

Download Full-text

A Change of Heart or a Change of Law? Withdrawing a Guilty Plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(e)

The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) ◽

10.2307/1144212 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 92 (1/2) ◽

pp. 273 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kirke D. Weaver

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Guilty Plea ◽

Federal Rule

Download Full-text

Is the Shrink's Role Shrinking? The Ambiguity of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2 concerning Government Psychiatric Testimony in Negativing Cases

University of Pennsylvania Law Review ◽

10.2307/3312727 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 147 (6) ◽

pp. 1403

Author(s):

R. Gregory Cochran

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Federal Rule

Download Full-text

Disclosure of Grand Jury Materials to Foreign Authorities under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)

Virginia Law Review ◽

10.2307/1072958 ◽

1984 ◽

Vol 70 (8) ◽

pp. 1623

Author(s):

M. R. K.

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Grand Jury ◽

Federal Rule

Download Full-text

Grand Jury: Disclosure of Grand Jury Materials to Government Attorneys for Civil Use under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)

The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) ◽

10.2307/1143061 ◽

1983 ◽

Vol 74 (4) ◽

pp. 1425

Author(s):

Tammy Jo Berge

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Grand Jury ◽

Federal Rule

Download Full-text

The Code of Criminal Procedure Relating to Procedure in the Criminal Courts of British India

10.1017/cbo9781139198202 ◽

2009 ◽

Author(s):

H. T. Prinsep

Keyword(s):

Criminal Procedure ◽

Criminal Courts ◽

British India

Download Full-text

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF UKRAINE AND THE STANDARDS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT ON HUMAN RIGHTS DURING THE JUDICIAL INQUIRY OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE ABSENCE OF THE ACCUSED (“IN ABSENTIA”)

Comparative-analytical law ◽

10.32782/2524-0390/2020.1.149 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 598-601

Author(s):

H.I. Tsybulnyk ◽

O.V. Lynnyk

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Criminal Procedure ◽

Criminal Proceedings ◽

European Court ◽

The Relationship

Download Full-text

Liability for Wrongful Deprivation of Liberty: Malice and Police Privilege

Edinburgh Law Review ◽

10.3366/elr.2020.0626 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 24 (2) ◽

pp. 175-201

Author(s):

Elspeth Reid

Keyword(s):

Police Officers ◽

Criminal Procedure

Infringement of liberty has long been regarded as a delict which requires to be compensated, but public officers may in some circumstances be protected against liability where freedom has been “lawfully abridged” in conformity with the rules of criminal procedure. However, the boundaries of this form of privilege have not always been delineated with clarity. This article will argue that they remain unclear following the Outer House decision in Whitehouse v Gormley. In particular it questions the basis for requiring the pursuer to prove malice where a claim is made against police officers for unlawful detention or arrest.

Download Full-text