Primary care discussion forum for the Indian Health System

2004 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Discussion Forum ◽  
Indian Health

scholarly journals Innovative Partnership Between Primary Care, AAA, and Academia Connects 4Ms and Social Determinants of Health

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 107-107
Author(s):  
Suzanne Leahy ◽  
Katie Ehlman ◽  
Lisa Maish ◽  
Brad Conrad ◽  
Jillian Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Language And Literacy ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
College Of Nursing ◽  
Value Based Care ◽  
The University

Abstract Nationally, there is a growing focus on addressing geriatric care in primary care settings. HRSA’s Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program (GWEP) has called for academic and health system partners to develop a reciprocal, innovative, cross-sector partnership that includes primary care sites and community-based agencies serving older adults. Through the University of Southern Indiana’s GWEP, the College of Nursing and Health Professions, the Deaconess Health System, three primary care clinics, and two Area Agencies on Aging (AAA) have joined to transform the healthcare of older adults regionally, including rural residents in the 12-county area. Core to the project is a value-based care model that “embeds” AAA care managers in primary care clinics. Preliminary evaluation indicates early success in improving the healthcare of older adults at one primary clinic, where clinical teams have referred 64 older adult patients to the AAA care manager. Among these 64 patients, 80% were connected to supplemental, community-based health services; 22% to programs addressing housing and transportation; and, nearly 10% to a range of other services (e.g., job training; language and literacy; and technology). In addition to presenting limited data on referred patients and referral outcomes, the presentation will share copies of the AAA referral log, to illustrate how resources were categorized by SDOH and added to support integration of the 4Ms.

scholarly journals Adoption of Health System Innovations: Evidence of Urban-Rural Disparities from the Ohio Primary Care Marketplace

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Tanenbaum ◽  
Mark Votruba ◽  
Douglas Einstadter ◽  
Thomas E. Love ◽  
Randall D. Cebul
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Urban Rural

scholarly journals Population-Based Pragmatic Trial of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care in the University of California Health System

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S-72-S-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Walling ◽  
Rebecca L. Sudore ◽  
Doug Bell ◽  
Chi-Hong Tseng ◽  
Christine Ritchie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Pragmatic Trial ◽  
Population Based ◽  
University Of California ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
The University

scholarly journals Patient and provider perception of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of behavioral health home (BHH) core components based on program implementation in an urban, safety-net health system

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263348952110437
Author(s):  
Ana M Progovac ◽  
Miriam C Tepper ◽  
H. Stephen Leff ◽  
Dharma E Cortés ◽  
Alexander (Cohen) Colts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Program Implementation ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Urban Safety ◽  
Core Components ◽  
Health Home

Background This manuscript evaluates patient and provider perspectives on the core components of a Behavioral Health Home (BHH) implemented in an urban, safety-net health system. The BHH integrated primary care and wellness services (e.g., on-site Nurse Practitioner and Care Manager, wellness groups and tools, population health management) into an existing outpatient clinic for people with serious mental illness (SMI). Methods As the qualitative component of a Hybrid Type I effectiveness-implementation study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with providers and patients 6 months after program implementation, and responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Valence coding (i.e., positive vs. negative acceptability) was also used to rate interviewees’ transcriptions with respect to their feedback of the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility/sustainability of 9 well-described and desirable Integrated Behavioral Health Core components (seven from prior literature and two additional components developed for this intervention). Themes from the thematic analysis were then mapped and organized by each of the 9 components and the degree to which these themes explain valence ratings by component. Results Responses about the team-based approach and universal screening for health conditions had the most positive valence across appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility/sustainability by both providers and patients. Areas of especially high mismatch between perceived provider appropriateness and measures of acceptability and feasibility/sustainability included population health management and use of evidence-based clinical models to improve physical wellness where patient engagement in specific activities and tools varied. Social and peer support was highly valued by patients while incorporating patient voice was also found to be challenging. Conclusions Findings reveal component-specific challenges regarding the acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability of specific components. These findings may partly explain mixed results from BHH models studied thus far in the peer-reviewed literature and may help provide concrete data for providers to improve BHH program implementation in clinical settings. Plain language abstract Many people with serious mental illness also have medical problems, which are made worse by lack of access to primary care. The Behavioral Health Home (BHH) model seeks to address this by adding primary care access into existing interdisciplinary mental health clinics. As these models are implemented with increasing frequency nationwide and a growing body of research continues to assess their health impacts, it is crucial to examine patient and provider experiences of BHH implementation to understand how implementation factors may contribute to clinical effectiveness. This study examines provider and patient perspectives of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility/sustainability of BHH model components at 6–7 months after program implementation at an urban, safety-net health system. The team-based approach of the BHH was perceived to be highly acceptable and appropriate. Although providers found certain BHH components to be highly appropriate in theory (e.g., population-level health management), their acceptability of these approaches as implemented in practice was not as high, and their feedback provides suggestions for model improvements at this and other health systems. Similarly, social and peer support was found to be highly appropriate by both providers and patients, but in practice, at months 6–7, the BHH studied had not yet developed a process of engaging patients in ongoing program operations that was highly acceptable by providers and patients alike. We provide these data on each specific BHH model component, which will be useful to improving implementation in clinical settings of BHH programs that share some or all of these program components.

scholarly journals Health system challenges affecting falls prevention in persons living with HIV: perspectives from physiotherapists in four sub-Saharan regions

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Y. Charumbira ◽  
Karina Berner ◽  
Quinette A. Louw
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Fall Prevention ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Prevention Services ◽  
Persons Living With Hiv ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
Living With Hiv

Abstract Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of physiotherapists in four selected regions of sub-Saharan Africa regarding health system challenges impacting the integration of physiotherapy-led falls prevention services in the primary care of persons living with HIV (PLWH). Background: Falls may pose a significant problem among younger PLWH in low- and middle-income countries. Physiotherapists’ role in optimising function and quality of life can do much in the prevention of falls in PLWH and reducing the harm that results. However, falls prevention strategies have not been implemented effectively especially in primary health care settings in sub-Saharan Africa. Physiotherapists’ account of the health system challenges they encounter may provide insights into potential strategies that may be considered in optimising fall prevention for PLWH in poorly resourced settings. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in selected urban districts in the capital cities of four sub-Saharan African countries. In-depth interviews were conducted with 21 purposively selected physiotherapists involved in the primary care of PLWH. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using deductive thematic content analysis. Findings: The main results are presented in the theme ‘Health care system challenges’ and in nine categories informed by the WHO health system framework: lack of policies and clinical practice guidelines, shortage/Inaccessible falls prevention services, inadequate human resource, physiotherapists not adequately equipped in falls prevention, inaccessible/No facilities for BMD measurement, inefficient data capturing systems, lack of evidence regarding falls among PLWH, unclear physiotherapy role descriptions, inefficient referral system. Physiotherapists highlighted the need for more information and research regarding fall prevention for PLWH, promote their role in the primary care of PLWH and adopt a patient-centred approach to fall prevention.

scholarly journals Delays and Unmet Need for Health Care Among Adult Primary Care Patients in a Restructured Urban Public Health System

2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 783-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison L. Diamant ◽  
Ron D. Hays ◽  
Leo S. Morales ◽  
Wesley Ford ◽  
Daphne Calmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Primary Care Patients

scholarly journals Identifying important health system factors that influence primary care practitioners’ referrals for cancer suspicion: a European cross-sectional survey

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e022904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Harris ◽  
Peter Vedsted ◽  
Magdalena Esteva ◽  
Peter Murchie ◽  
Isabelle Aubin-Auger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Cancer Symptoms ◽  
Referral Decision ◽  
System Factors ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners

ObjectivesCancer survival and stage of disease at diagnosis and treatment vary widely across Europe. These differences may be partly due to variations in access to investigations and specialists. However, evidence to explain how different national health systems influence primary care practitioners’ (PCPs’) referral decisions is lacking.This study analyses health system factors potentially influencing PCPs’ referral decision-making when consulting with patients who may have cancer, and how these vary between European countries.DesignBased on a content-validity consensus, a list of 45 items relating to a PCP’s decisions to refer patients with potential cancer symptoms for further investigation was reduced to 20 items. An online questionnaire with the 20 items was answered by PCPs on a five-point Likert scale, indicating how much each item affected their own decision-making in patients that could have cancer. An exploratory factor analysis identified the factors underlying PCPs’ referral decision-making.SettingA primary care study; 25 participating centres in 20 European countries.Participants1830 PCPs completed the survey. The median response rate for participating centres was 20.7%.Outcome measuresThe factors derived from items related to PCPs’ referral decision-making. Mean factor scores were produced for each country, allowing comparisons.ResultsFactor analysis identified five underlying factors: PCPs’ ability to refer; degree of direct patient access to secondary care; PCPs’ perceptions of being under pressure; expectations of PCPs’ role; and extent to which PCPs believe that quality comes before cost in their health systems. These accounted for 47.4% of the observed variance between individual responses.ConclusionsFive healthcare system factors influencing PCPs’ referral decision-making in 20 European countries were identified. The factors varied considerably between European countries. Knowledge of these factors could assist development of health service policies to produce better cancer outcomes, and inform future research to compare national cancer diagnostic pathways and outcomes.

Fragmentation of Care Among Black Women With Breast Cancer and Comorbidities: The Role of Health Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e637-e644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Doose ◽  
Janeth I. Sanchez ◽  
Joel C. Cantor ◽  
Jesse J. Plascak ◽  
Michael B. Steinberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Black Women ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Primary Care Visit ◽  
Practice Setting ◽  
Care Fragmentation

PURPOSE: Black women are disproportionately burdened by comorbidities and breast cancer. The complexities of coordinating care for multiple health conditions can lead to adverse consequences. Care coordination may be exacerbated when care is received outside the same health system, defined as care fragmentation. We examine types of practice setting for primary and breast cancer care to assess care fragmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of Black women diagnosed with breast cancer in New Jersey who also had a prior diagnosis of diabetes and/or hypertension (N = 228). Following breast cancer diagnosis, we examined types of practice setting for first primary care visit and primary breast surgery, through medical chart abstraction, and identified whether care was used within or outside the same health system. We used multivariable logistic regression to explore sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with care fragmentation. RESULTS: Diverse primary care settings were used: medical groups (32.0%), health systems (29.4%), solo practices (23.7%), Federally Qualified Health Centers (8.3%), and independent hospitals (6.1%). Surgical care predominately occurred in health systems (79.8%), with most hospitals being Commission on Cancer–accredited. Care fragmentation was experienced by 78.5% of Black women, and individual-level factors (age, health insurance, cancer stage, and comorbidity count) were not associated with care fragmentation ( P > .05). CONCLUSION: The majority of Black breast cancer survivors with comorbidities received primary care and surgical care in different health systems, illustrating care fragmentation. Strategies for care coordination and health care delivery across health systems and practice settings are needed for health equity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document