Common Threads: Creating a Community of Storytellers to Combat HIV/AIDS-Related Stigma for-Same-Gender-Living Men and Women

2013 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-236
Author(s):  
Meredith L. Woehler ◽  
Kristin L. Cullen-Lester ◽  
Caitlin M. Porter ◽  
Katherine A. Frear

Substantial research has documented challenges women experience building and benefiting from networks to achieve career success. Yet fundamental questions remain regarding which aspects of men’s and women’s networks differ and how differences impact their careers. To spur future research to address these questions, we present an integrative framework to clarify how and why gender and networks—in concert—may explain career inequality. We delineate two distinct, complementary explanations: (1) unequal network characteristics (UNC) asserts that men and women have different network characteristics, which account for differences in career success; (2) unequal network returns (UNR) asserts that even when men and women have the same network characteristics, they yield different degrees of career success. Further, we explain why UNC and UNR emerge by identifying mechanisms related to professional contexts, actors, and contacts. Using this framework, we review evidence of UNC and UNR for specific network characteristics. We found that men’s and women’s networks are similar in structure (i.e., size, openness, closeness, contacts’ average and structural status) but differ in composition (i.e., proportion of men, same-gender, and kin contacts). Many differences mattered for career success. We identified evidence of UNC only (same-gender contacts), UNR only (actors’ and contacts’ network openness, contacts’ relative status), neither UNC nor UNR (size), and both UNC and UNR (proportion of men contacts). Based on these initial findings, we offer guidance to organizations aiming to address inequality resulting from gender differences in network creation and utilization, and we present a research agenda for scholars to advance these efforts.


BMJ Open ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. e002755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keivan Ahmadi ◽  
Daniel D Reidpath ◽  
Pascale Allotey ◽  
Mohamed Azmi Ahmad Hassali

Author(s):  
Md Tanvir Hasan ◽  
Samir Ranjan Nath ◽  
Nabilah S Khan ◽  
Owasim Akram ◽  
Tony Michael Gomes
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth C. Kalichman ◽  
Leickness C. Simbayi ◽  
Redwaan Vermaak ◽  
Sean Jooste ◽  
Demetria Cain

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 473-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Vanable ◽  
Michael P. Carey ◽  
Donald C. Blair ◽  
Rae A. Littlewood

Author(s):  
Marcos Reyes-Estrada ◽  
Nelson Varas-Díaz ◽  
Richard Parker ◽  
Mark Padilla ◽  
Sheilla Rodríguez-Madera

HIV-related stigma among nurses can impact health care services for people with HIV/AIDS (PWHA). health care professionals’ religious views can potentially foster stigmatizing attitudes. There is scarce scientific literature exploring the role of religion on HIV/AIDS stigma among nurses. This study aimed to explore the role of religion in the stigmatization of PWHA by nurses in Puerto Rico. We conducted an exploratory study using qualitative techniques. We conducted 40 in-depth interviews with nurses who provided services to PWHA. Three main factors emerged in the analysis as contributors to HIV/AIDS stigmatization: (1) nurses’ personal religious experiences, (2) religion as a rationale for HIV-related stigma, and (3) religious practices during health care delivery. The results show that religious beliefs play a role in how nurses understood HIV/AIDS and provided service. Results point toward the need for interventions that address personal religious beliefs while reducing HIV/AIDS stigma among nurses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document