Relating decision making styles to predicting self-efficacy and a generalized expectation of success and failure

Author(s):  
Thomas E. Nygren ◽  
Rebecca J. White
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Nygren ◽  
Rebecca J. White

The theoretical and applied distinction between a propensity toward a more intuitive decision style versus a more analytical style has gained prominence in recent years. A self-report measure, the Decision Making Styles Inventory, is presented and is shown to differentiate among those who endorse an analytical, an intuitive, or an avoidant, regret-based decision style. Results from one study, a horse race betting task, indicated that those who endorsed a decision style, particularly those endorsing a flexible analytical and intuitive style, performed better on the task than those who did not. A second study clearly showed that decision style was related to self reports of self-efficacy, optimism, and self-regard. These results suggest that having either an analytical, intuitive or combined decision style is beneficial to the decision maker.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 22-32
Author(s):  
Enkh-Otgon NARANGEREL ◽  
Anıl Boz Semerci

The aim of this study was to investigate the mediating role of self-efficacy in decision making between the relationship of workload, work control and decision-making styles. Although the decision-making process seems basically the same for every individual, it is different for each individual in terms of content. The reason for this is the methods used by individuals in making decisions and their approach to problems are different. The data was gathered from 252 government officials, chiefs, branch managers and heads of the departments of the Republic of Turkey. The data was analysed with structural equation model. The results indicate that there was a negative relationship between the level of workload and vigilant decision-making style, and a positive relationship with buck-passing, procrastination, and hypervigilance decision making styles. On the other hand, a positive relationship between work control and vigilance decision-making style, and a negative relationship between buck-passing, procrastination and hypervigilance decision-making styles were observed. At the same time, there was a negative relationship between workload and self-efficacy in decision-making, yet a positive relationship was found with work control. In addition, a full mediating role in the relationship between workload in decision-making self-efficacy, work control, vigilant, buck-passing, and procrastination decision-making styles; a partial mediating role was found in the relationship between workload and hyper vigilant decision-making style in work control were found separately. The results were interpreted with the light of literature and lead to develop practical suggestions for managers and employees.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Nygren ◽  
Rebecca White ◽  
Kristi Snuttjer

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lore M. Dickey ◽  
Daniel L. Walinsky ◽  
Kara Cline ◽  
Crystal Rofkahr ◽  
Cindy L. Juntunen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document