Consequences of "part-time sick leave" for colleagues and management

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Sieurin ◽  
E. Vingard ◽  
M. Josephson
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 447-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eira Viikari-Juntura ◽  
Lauri J Virta ◽  
Johanna Kausto ◽  
Ilona Autti-Rämö ◽  
Kari-Pekka Martimo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 155-155
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Zheng ◽  
Xuesong Han ◽  
Matthew P. Banegas ◽  
Jingxuan Zhao ◽  
Ashish Rai ◽  
...  

155 Background: Nearly 40% of cancer survivors are of working age in the U.S. Access to high quality diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship care requires both health insurance coverage and sick leave, key components of employer health benefits. This study examines work limitations, paid sick leave, and employer offered health insurance among cancer survivors. Methods: We used the National Health Interview Survey (2001-2017) to identify cancer survivors aged 18-64 years. Work limitations were asked among all cancer survivors regardless of work status (n = 15,247), and categorized into unable to work, limited in type/amount of work, and not limited at all. Paid sick leave and employer offered health insurance offered were asked of cancer survivors who were working in the last week (n = 8741). We used generalized ordinal logistic regressions to examine work limitation and employer health benefits among cancer survivors, controlling for demographic characteristics, time since cancer diagnosis, number of cancer diagnoses, income, and comorbidities. Stratified analyses by type of workplace (private sector, federal/state/local government, and self-employed), and hours worked per week (full time with 35+ hours per week vs part time < 35 hours per week) was conducted. Results: Among cancer survivors aged 18-64 years, 10.7% and 5.3% reported unable to work at all and limited in types/amounts of work, respectively; 57.7% and 67.6% of those working in the last week received paid sick leave and employer offered health insurance, respectively. In stratified analyses, government jobs were associated with the highest paid sick leave and employer insurance (85.7% and 85.6%, respectively), followed by private sector (58.3% and 70.7%, respectively), and self-employed (8.3% and 15.7%), respectively. Moreover, full time jobs had higher paid sick leave (65.2% and 21.9%, respectively) and employer insurance (75.7% and 29.1%, respectively) then part time jobs. Conclusions: Cancer survivors experience work limitations and many working cancer survivors do not receive paid sick leave or health insurance from their employers. Evaluation of the effects of employer-based health benefits on survivorship care and outcomes will be important for future research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Svärd ◽  
K Alexanderson

Abstract Background Sickness certification guidelines, introduced in Sweden 2007, are to support physician’s work with sickness certification of patients. Our aim was to explore the clinical importance of the guidelines, by studying what kind of information from guidelines the physicians use, and if this differ between type of clinics. Methods Data from a questionnaire sent to all 34 718 physicians in Sweden in 2017 were used (54% response rate). The study is based on answers from the 13 750 physicians who had sick-leave consultations. Results Half of the respondents used the guidelines at least once a month, and this was most common in primary healthcare (72%), occupational health services (64%) and psychiatry (61%). The type of information used differed; 53% used recommendations about suggested sick-leave duration and 29% about degree (full- or part-time) of sickness absence. Using information about function respectively work capacity was more common within psychiatry (42 and 42%), primary healthcare (37 and 38%) and occupational health services (35 and 41%) and less common among physicians in surgery and orthopaedic clinics (12 and 12%) who more often used information about duration (48 and 53%). In total, 74% reported that the guidelines to some extent were problematic to apply while 29% reported that they improved the quality of how they handled sickness certification tasks. Half (47%) experienced that the guidelines facilitated their contacts with patients. Conclusions The use of sickness certification guidelines varied between type of clinic and a majority experienced to some extent that the guidelines were problematic to apply. Further studies are needed to assess what information physicians in different settings need and what developments of the guidelines that are warranted. Key messages Half of the physicians used the sickness certification guidelines every month, but the type of information used varied with type of clinical setting. As many as half of the physicians stated that the sickness certification guidelines facilitated their contacts with patients, but a majority found them somewhat problematic to apply.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eira Viikari-Juntura ◽  
Taina Leinonen ◽  
Lauri J Virta ◽  
Ismo Hiljanen ◽  
Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahman Shiri ◽  
Johanna Kausto ◽  
Kari-Pekka Martimo ◽  
Leena Kaila-Kangas ◽  
Esa-Pekka Takala ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document