Psychiatric disabilities and employment discrimination: An empirical analysis of EEOC ADA Title I charges

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. An ◽  
R. Roessler
2021 ◽  
pp. 104420732110369
Author(s):  
Peter Blanck

This article offers a glimpse of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) of 1990, as amended by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”), at its 30th anniversary. It considers current issues before the courts, primarily legal cases from 2020 and 2021, and new questions in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, such the latitude of the ADA’s antidiscrimination protections and its definition of disability. It provides a quick primer on the basics of the ADA: employment discrimination under Title I, antidiscrimination mandates for state and local governments under Title II, and commands to places of accommodation offering services to the public under Title III. The ADA at 30 remains a beacon for a future in which all people, regardless of individual difference, will be welcomed as full and equal members of society.


2002 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 988-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Moss ◽  
Jeffrey Swanson ◽  
Michael Ullman ◽  
Scott Burris

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Spirito Dalgin

This article describes the intricacies of Title I of the ADA for people with psychiatric disabilities. Due to the complexities of the law it is important that rehabilitation counselors understand the specific dilemmas Title I presents for this population. Concerns about the ADA's definition of disability, qualification for the job, requesting accommodations, and disclosure will be discussed. Additionally, recent case law is provided on the impact of Title I for people with psychiatric disabilities. Rehabilitation counselors will gain critical and current information about ADA issues for people with psychiatric disabilities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 614-623
Author(s):  
David R. Strauser ◽  
Mykal J. Leslie ◽  
Phillip Rumrill ◽  
Brian McMahon ◽  
Chelsea Greco

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias R. Mehl ◽  
Shannon E. Holleran

Abstract. In this article, the authors provide an empirical analysis of the obtrusiveness of and participants' compliance with a relatively new psychological ambulatory assessment method, called the electronically activated recorder or EAR. The EAR is a modified portable audio-recorder that periodically records snippets of ambient sounds from participants' daily environments. In tracking moment-to-moment ambient sounds, the EAR yields an acoustic log of a person's day as it unfolds. As a naturalistic observation sampling method, it provides an observer's account of daily life and is optimized for the assessment of audible aspects of participants' naturally-occurring social behaviors and interactions. Measures of self-reported and behaviorally-assessed EAR obtrusiveness and compliance were analyzed in two samples. After an initial 2-h period of relative obtrusiveness, participants habituated to wearing the EAR and perceived it as fairly unobtrusive both in a short-term (2 days, N = 96) and a longer-term (10-11 days, N = 11) monitoring. Compliance with the method was high both during the short-term and longer-term monitoring. Somewhat reduced compliance was identified over the weekend; this effect appears to be specific to student populations. Important privacy and data confidentiality considerations around the EAR method are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document