Overachievers and party animals: Personality judgments from Facebook check-ins

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janeisha Hood ◽  
Erica Lams ◽  
Cathy Wica ◽  
Constance Netisingha ◽  
Jeremy Ashton Houska
Keyword(s):  
Personality Judgments

A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms.

2002 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel D. Gosling ◽  
Sei Jin Ko ◽  
Thomas Mannarelli ◽  
Margaret E. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Personality Judgments

scholarly journals Contributions of Nonverbal Cues to the Accurate Judgment of Personality Traits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon M. Breil ◽  
Sarah Osterholz ◽  
Steffen Nestler ◽  
Mitja D. Back
Keyword(s):  
Facial Expressions ◽  
Body Language ◽  
Nonverbal Cues ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Judgment Accuracy ◽  
Situational Characteristics ◽  
Accurate Judgment ◽  
Personality Judgments ◽  
Conceptual Overview ◽  
Different Levels

This chapter summarizes research on nonverbal expressions of behavior (nonverbal cues) and how they contribute to the accuracy of personality judgments. First, it presents a conceptual overview of relevant nonverbal cues in the domains of facial expressions, body language, paralanguage, and appearance as well as approaches to assess these cues on different levels of aggregation. It then summarizes research on the validity of nonverbal cues (what kind of nonverbal cues are good indicators of personality?) and the utilization of nonverbal cues (what kind of nonverbal cues lead to personality impressions?), resulting in a catalog of those cues that drive judgment accuracy for different traits. Finally, it discusses personal and situational characteristics that moderate the expression and utilization of nonverbal cues and give an outlook for future research.

scholarly journals Body Odor Based Personality Judgments: The Effect of Fragranced Cosmetics

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Sorokowska ◽  
Piotr Sorokowski ◽  
Jan Havlíček
Keyword(s):  
Body Odor ◽  
Personality Judgments

Lens and Dual Lens Models

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Osterholz ◽  
Simon M. Breil ◽  
Steffen Nestler ◽  
Mitja D. Back
Keyword(s):  
Impression Formation ◽  
Interpersonal Perception ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Formation Processes ◽  
Lens Model ◽  
Model Framework ◽  
Flexible Tool ◽  
Basic Concepts ◽  
Personality Judgments

This chapter presents variants of Brunswik’s lens model aimed to understand whether, when, and why trait judgments are more or less accurate. After outlining the basic concepts of lens models, it describes exemplary studies that have applied the lens model to unravel personality expression and impression formation processes that lead to more or less accurate judgments. Next, it gives an overview of factors that can influence the accuracy of trait judgments and explains these accuracy moderators within the lens model framework. It then describes an extension of the lens model, the dual lens model, that differentiates more controlled versus more automatic aspects on all levels of the lens model (i.e., personality self-concept, cues, personality judgments). It also briefly summarizes further extensions and highlights the lens model as a flexible tool to study cue processes underlying accuracy and related interpersonal perception phenomena. Finally, the chapter concludes by outlining suggestions for future lens model applications in accuracy research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document