Addressing the My-Side Bias in Argumentation

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Wolfe ◽  
M. Anne Britt
Keyword(s):  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e0124999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Bruno ◽  
Marco Bertamini ◽  
Federica Protti
Keyword(s):  
The City ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainee L. Kaczorowski ◽  
Gali Blumenfeld ◽  
Avi Koplovich ◽  
Shai Markman

Floral color is an important cue that converged in many ornithophilous flowers and can be used by nectarivorous birds to make foraging decisions. Wild ornithophilous flowers are frequently red, although they are more often yellow in Israel. The Palestine sunbird (Nectarinia osea) is the only nectarivorous bird in Israel and surrounding Mediterranean areas. Given the prevalence of yellow flowers in their habitats (along with sunbirds' expected sensitivity increase in this region of color vision), we predicted that Palestine sunbirds prefer yellow food sources over red. We examined sunbird foraging behavior when they were presented simultaneously with a yellow and red feeder, each containing the same quantity and quality of food. We investigated whether sunbirds had a side bias in the color preference experiment, but also in a separate experiment where both feeders were white. Sunbirds did not exhibit a significant color bias, while they did have a significant preference for a particular side of the cage. Location appears to be a more important cue than color to Palestine sunbirds, likely because location can offer information on the most rewarding plants and recently depleted flowers. However, color may still provide useful information that could influence foraging decisions in different contexts.


2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. 255-256
Author(s):  
M J Coffin ◽  
R Manjarin ◽  
J M Mumm ◽  
E M Bortoluzzi ◽  
L A Ruiz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 190929 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Daisy Kaplan ◽  
Samantha Y. Goodrich ◽  
Kelly Melillo-Sweeting ◽  
Diana Reiss

Lateralized behaviour is found in humans and a wide variety of other species. At a population level, lateralization of behaviour suggests hemispheric specialization may underlie this behaviour. As in other cetaceans, dolphins exhibit a strong right-side bias in foraging behaviour. Common bottlenose dolphins in The Bahamas use a foraging technique termed ‘crater feeding’, in which they swim slowly along the ocean floor, scanning the substrate using echolocation, and then bury their rostrums into the sand to obtain prey. The bottlenose dolphins off Bimini, The Bahamas, frequently execute a sharp turn before burying their rostrums in the sand. Based on data collected from 2012 to 2018, we report a significant right-side (left turn) bias in these dolphins. Out of 709 turns recorded from at least 27 different individuals, 99.44% ( n = 705) were to the left (right side and right eye down) [ z = 3.275, p = 0.001]. Only one individual turned right (left side and left eye down, 4/4 turns). We hypothesize that this right-side bias may be due in part to the possible laterization of echolocation production mechanisms, the dolphins' use of the right set of phonic lips to produce echolocation clicks, and a right eye (left hemisphere) advantage in visual discrimination and visuospatial processing.


2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 475-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Scola ◽  
Jacques Vauclair

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Gentzkow ◽  
Jesse M Shapiro

In this essay, we evaluate the case for competition in news markets from the perspective of economics. First, we consider the simple proposition that when more points of view are heard and defended, beliefs will converge to the truth. This concept of “competition” is several steps removed from market competition among actual media firms, but it has played a prominent role in the legal arguments for a free press. We then explore three mechanisms by which increasing competition, or more precisely increasing the number of independently-owned firms, can limit bias or distortions that originate on the supply-side of the media market: First, when governments attempt to manipulate news, competition can increase the likelihood that the media remain independent. Second, when news providers have an interest in manipulating consumers' beliefs, diversity in such incentives can reduce the risk of information being suppressed or distorted. Third, competition may drive firms to invest in providing timely and accurate coverage. Overall, we argue that there are robust reasons to expect competition to be effective in disciplining supply-side bias. Next, we ask how the effect of competition changes when distortions originate on the demand side of the market—when consumers themselves demand biased or less socially relevant news. We find that increased competition may or may not improve welfare in these cases, though we caution against using this as a justification for concentrating media power in the hands of state-controlled or regulated firms.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-73
Author(s):  
Ken MATSUDA ◽  
Makoto ICHIKAWA ◽  
Masaru NAKAJIMA ◽  
Moritaka KOUROKI
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document