A criterion for social appropriateness judgment in rewards allocation

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Shimizu
Keyword(s):  
Social Appropriateness

Social Appropriateness Concerns Index

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Pauker ◽  
Evan P. Apfelbaum ◽  
Brian Spitzer
Keyword(s):  
Social Appropriateness

Evaluation of the ecological effectiveness and social appropriateness of fishing regulations in the Bangladesh Sundarbans using a new multi-disciplinary assessment framework

2016 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 410-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin S. Thompson ◽  
Annabelle J. Bladon ◽  
Zubair H. Fahad ◽  
Samiul Mohsanin ◽  
Heather J. Koldewey
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Framework ◽  
Social Appropriateness ◽  
Fishing Regulations

PERCEPTIONS OF SOLICITED VERSUS UNSOLICITED SELFDISCLOSURE

1986 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee Hund ◽  
Kenneth R. Olson ◽  
Robert P. Markley
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Interpersonal Attraction ◽  
Significant Interaction Effect ◽  
Self Disclosure ◽  
Social Appropriateness

The present investigation examined perception of persons who emitted unsolicited self-disclosure as compared to perception of persons who emitted solicited self-disclosure. Sex differences were also examined. Subjects were 158 undergraduate students who were randomly assigned to listen to one of four audiotapes. The audiotaped vignette consisted of actors emitting either solicited or unsolicited selfdisclosure. Subjects rated the actors on social skillfulness, social appropriateness, and interpersonal attraction. Unsolicited self-disclosers were rated as significantly less socially appropriate and interpersonally attractive. A significant interaction effect of disclosure mode by actor sex was also found for social skillfulness. The female was viewed as less socially skillful than the male when she failed to solicit disclosure. Explanations of these findings and their implications are discussed.

scholarly journals Developing Multiple-Choice Discourse Completion Tasks as Pedagogical Materials in L2 Pragmaticserials in L2 Pragmatics

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanshan Chen ◽  
D. Victoria Rau
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Standardized Tests ◽  
Speech Act ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Pragmatic Competence ◽  
Educational Systems ◽  
L2 Pragmatics ◽  
Grammatical Accuracy ◽  
Teaching Learning ◽  
Social Appropriateness

<p>This study reports the development of pragmatics teaching materials in the format of multiple-choice<br />discourse completion tasks (MDCTs) by two groups of American in-service TESOL teachers in the<br />United States. One advantage of using MDCTs as pedagogical materials in L2 pragmatics instruction<br />is that they incorporate positive (i.e., the key) and negative (i.e., the distractors) evidence, both of<br />which have been demonstrated to facilitate language learning in SLA research. The other advantage is<br />that they prepare students for multiple-choice standardized tests, which are very common in<br />test-oriented educational systems like Taiwan, China, Japan and Korea. In this study, we asked one<br />group of teachers to design MDCTs based on social appropriateness. Four months later, we asked the<br />other group of teachers to rate and comment on the content and form of the learner speech act data.<br />Each teacher was then required to construct a multiple-choice pragmatics task with a balance between<br />social appropriateness and grammatical accuracy. We close our paper by discussing the pragmatics<br />tasks created by these teachers and suggesting construction principles as a guide to teaching, learning<br />and assessing L2 pragmatic competence.</p>

scholarly journals Prophetic Leadership Scale’s Validation and the Tendency of Normative Response

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-158
Author(s):  
Fida Tazkiyah ◽  
Helli Ihsan ◽  
Muhammad Ariez Musthofa
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Authentic Leadership ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Measurement Tool ◽  
Measuring Instrument ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Normative Response ◽  
Convergent Validation ◽  
Social Appropriateness

This study aims to validate the prophetic leadership scale by using a quantitative approach. 202 leaders were involved in this study. Data analysis technique that has been used for construct validation is factorial validation with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), a convergent validation, discriminant validation, and social desirability bias with Pearson correlation. There are 4 instruments used in this study, namely the measuring instrument of prophetic leadership, the measuring instrument of authentic leadership as a convergent validator, the measuring instrument of religiosity as a discriminant validator, and the measuring tool of social desirability as a validator of social appropriateness bias. The prophetic leadership measurement tool measures the same construct as the authentic leadership measurement tool, and measures different constructs from the religiosity measurement tool, and the prophetic leadership measurement tool has a social appropriateness bias or the respondent's tendency to give answers in accordance with norms. The findings raise a prospect that social desirability bias’s influences fitness indices in a scale’s validation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document