scholarly journals Linear separability and concept learning: Eyetracking individual differences

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron B. Hoffman ◽  
Bob Rehder
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Concept Learning ◽  
Linear Separability

Individual differences in concept learning

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt J. Robbins ◽  
Mark A. McDaniel
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Concept Learning

scholarly journals Individual differences in information processing during concept learning

1969 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 287-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard I. Jacobson ◽  
Jim Millham ◽  
Stephen E. Berger
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Concept Learning

Experimental Methodology and Theory-Building in Mathematical Psychology

1971 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz F. S. Natalicio ◽  
Ronald V. Kidd
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Concept Learning ◽  
Theory Building ◽  
Mathematical Psychology ◽  
Experimental Methodology

An inquiry is made into the directions that theory-building in psychology might be taking with respect to the new trend in experimental methodology generated by mathematical models, concept-learning studies, and studies in individual differences. The implications of nomological theories, informal theories, and modeling activities with respect to this trend are analyzed in general, and an integrative description is developed. Particular attention is given to the problems presented by the use of isomorphism as the implicit justification for this methodology. This paper attempts to outline some basic issues in theory-building which seem in need of clarification.

Linear separability and concept learning: Context, relational properties, and concept naturalness

1986 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D Wattenmaker ◽  
Gerald I Dewey ◽  
Timothy D Murphy ◽  
Douglas L Medin
Keyword(s):  
Concept Learning ◽  
Learning Context ◽  
Relational Properties ◽  
Linear Separability

Individual Differences in Concept Learning of Painting Styles

1979 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth A. Hill ◽  
Faizal Junus
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Individual Difference ◽  
Concept Learning ◽  
Learning Task ◽  
The Other ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Quick Test ◽  
Individual Difference Variables ◽  
Esthetic Judgment

52 male and female adults were given a concept-learning task involving abstract and representational painting styles. The task involved learning to recognize new instances of artists' paintings on the basis of exposure to previous exemplars. Subjects were also given Cattell's 16 PF, Meier's Art Judgment Test, and the Quick Test (to assess intelligence). Results indicated that learning of both painting styles occurred, although the ability to learn one type of art did not predict the degree of success at learning the other. The ability to learn abstract versus representational styles was related to different individual-difference variables, although correlations were generally low. Learning abstract styles was correlated with self-conflict and tension while learning representational art was correlated with measures of self-assuredness and good esthetic judgment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document