Maintaining Healthy Research Relationships: Academic Industry Relationships

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Huntsman ◽  
Jane Shelby ◽  
Linden Rhoads ◽  
Heather Arnett
Keyword(s):  
Research Relationships

Embodying the Field

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Hoel
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
South African ◽  
Muslim Women ◽  
Power Dynamics ◽  
Ethnographic Research ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Research Relationships ◽  
Embodied Practice

This article focuses on the various ways in which research relationships evolve and are negotiated by paying particular attention to the embodied nature of ethnographic research. By drawing on my own research experience of interviewing South African Muslim women about sexual dynamics, I critically engage debates concerning power dynamics in research relationships as well as researcher positionality. I argue that researchers should pay increasing attention to the multiple ways in which doing research always is an embodied practice. I present three case studies that highlight the complex ways in which research encounters speak to notions of intimacy, vulnerability and affect. In this way I argue that research encounters forge primary human relationalities that are marked by moments of convergence, conflict and despondency.

Yarning as protected space: relational accountability in research

2021 ◽  
pp. 117718012098615
Author(s):  
Stuart Barlo ◽  
William (Bill) Edgar Boyd ◽  
Margaret Hughes ◽  
Shawn Wilson ◽  
Alessandro Pelizzon
Keyword(s):  
Research Methodology ◽  
Personal Experience ◽  
Indigenous Research ◽  
Indigenous Australian ◽  
Australian Context ◽  
Data History ◽  
Research Relationships ◽  
Relational Accountability ◽  
Relational Process ◽  
The Way

In this article, we open up Yarning as a fundamentally relational methodology. We discuss key relationships involved in Indigenous research, including with participants, Country, Ancestors, data, history, and Knowledge. We argue that the principles and protocols associated with the deepest layers of yarning in an Indigenous Australian context create a protected space which supports the researcher to develop and maintain accountability in each of these research relationships. Protection and relational accountability in turn contribute to research which is trustworthy and has integrity. Woven throughout the article are excerpts of a yarn in which the first author reflects on his personal experience of this research methodology. We hope this device serves to demonstrate the way yarning as a relational process of communication helps to bring out deeper reflection and analysis and invoke accountability in all of our research relationships.

Introduction

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Gatrell ◽  
Esther Dermott
Keyword(s):  
Social Research ◽  
Visual Methods ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
The Social ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Research Relationships ◽  
The Impact

This introductory chapter explains how different research questions and methods can contribute to better understanding of contemporary fathers, fatherhood, and fathering. Given the enhanced methodological diversity and increased sophistication of methods across the social sciences, embracing qualitative and quantitative approaches, traditional (such as interviewing) and contemporary approaches (such as netnography and visual methods), and general ‘handbooks’ offering basic introductions to social research have limited use for advanced researchers and students. The book aims to link detailed concerns about conducting individual projects to wider methodological debates concerning the value of different forms and sources of data, the negotiation of research relationships, and the impact of research findings on participants, policy makers, employers, and a wider public.

Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry

1996 ◽  
Vol 335 (23) ◽  
pp. 1734-1739 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Blumenthal ◽  
Eric G. Campbell ◽  
Nancyanne Causino ◽  
Karen Seashore Louis
Keyword(s):  
Life Science ◽  
Science Faculty ◽  
Research Relationships

Research Relationships and Relevancy

1971 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 2-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Creswell
Keyword(s):  
Research Relationships

scholarly journals Po pierwsze — człowiek. Autoetnografia w kontekście teorii sprawstwa Margaret Archer

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 33-52
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Majbroda
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Anthropology ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Significant Part ◽  
The World ◽  
Research Relationships ◽  
Anthropological Literature ◽  
Point Of Departure ◽  
A Current ◽  
Tools And Methods

The aim of this article is to show autoethnography in the context of Margaret Archer’s theory of agency. The author’s point of departure is the assumption that autoethnography is not solely a current in socio-cultural anthropology where anthropologists are focused on themselves, nor is it limited to the genre of anthropological literature in which the experiences and emotions of fieldwork researchers are displayed in the foreground. The author shows that autoethnography makes use of the reflectiveness of being in the world that is an immanent characteristic of knowing subjects. A significant part of anthropological praxis also demands from researchers a permanent autoreflexivity. This autoreflexivity concerns the aims of knowing, the course of field research, relationships during it, tools and methods of knowledge, and the cultural, social, and political contexts of practicing anthropology and its consequences. This autoreflexivity is the source of agency. Reflection about ourselves begins with a thought and in an internal conversation; these are the basis of an integral part of anthropological praxis—agency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document