Embodied Semantic Processing: The Neural Correlates of the Body-Object Interaction Effect

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penny M. Pexman ◽  
Ian S. Hargreaves ◽  
Gemma A. Leonard ◽  
Paul D. Siakaluk ◽  
Bradley G. Goodyear
Author(s):  
Ian S. Hargreaves ◽  
Gemma A. Leonard ◽  
Penny M. Pexman ◽  
Daniel J. Pittman ◽  
Paul D. Siakaluk ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Siakaluk ◽  
Michele Wellsby ◽  
William J. Owen ◽  
Penny M. Pexman

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1239-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARÍA ÁNGELES ALONSO ◽  
EMILIANO DÍEZ ◽  
ANTONIO M. DÍEZ-ÁLAMO ◽  
ANGEL FERNANDEZ

ABSTRACTAn individual’s sense of the extent to which her or his body physically interacts with objects in the environment (body–object interaction; BOI) has been empirically shown to modulate lexical and semantic processing of object names. To allow for further exploration of the nature of those effects, BOI ratings for 750 Spanish nouns were obtained from 178 young adult participants. Statistical analyses showed moderate correlations between BOI indicators and some psycholinguistic indexes, such as word imageability and age of acquisition. In addition, an exploration of lexical associative relationships revealed that high-BOI words have a consistent tendency to be associated with words naming parts of the body. The ratings could be useful to researchers who are interested in manipulating or controlling for the effects of BOI in their language-processing studies. The complete norms are available for free downloading at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/kd5vf/).


Cognition ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 433-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Siakaluk ◽  
Penny M. Pexman ◽  
Laura Aguilera ◽  
William J. Owen ◽  
Christopher R. Sears

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Wellsby ◽  
Paul D. Siakaluk ◽  
William J. Owen ◽  
Penny M. Pexman

AbstractBody-object interaction (BOI) measures people's perceptions of the ease with which a human body can physically interact with a word's referent. Facilitatory BOI effects, involving faster responses for high BOI words, have been reported in a number of visual word recognition tasks using button press responses. Since BOI effects have only been observed in button-press tasks, it is possible that the effects may be due to priming by high BOI words of the motor system, rather than activation of stored motor information in the lexical semantic system. If this hypothesis is correct, BOI effects should not be observed in tasks using verbal responses. We tested this hypothesis in three versions of a go/no-go semantic categorization task: one version required button press responses, whereas the other two versions required verbal responses. Contrary to the motor priming hypothesis, we observed facilitatory BOI effects in all three versions of the semantic categorization task. These results support the inference that stored motor information is indeed an important component of the lexical semantic system.


Author(s):  
Aleksey Klokov ◽  
Evgenii Slobodyuk ◽  
Michael Charnine

The object of the research when writing the work was the body of text data collected together with the scientific advisor and the algorithms for processing the natural language of analysis. The stream of hypotheses has been tested against computer science scientific publications through a series of simulation experiments described in this dissertation. The subject of the research is algorithms and the results of the algorithms, aimed at predicting promising topics and terms that appear in the course of time in the scientific environment. The result of this work is a set of machine learning models, with the help of which experiments were carried out to identify promising terms and semantic relationships in the text corpus. The resulting models can be used for semantic processing and analysis of other subject areas.


Neuroreport ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 777-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen J. Stekelenburg ◽  
Beatrice de Gelder

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence J. Taylor ◽  
Rolf A. Zwaan

AbstractEmpirical research has shown that the processing of words and sentences is accompanied by activation of the brain's motor system in language users. The degree of precision observed in this activation seems to be contingent upon (1) the meaning of a linguistic construction and (2) the depth with which readers process that construction. In addition, neurological evidence shows a correspondence between a disruption in the neural correlates of overt action and the disruption of semantic processing of language about action. These converging lines of evidence can be taken to support the hypotheses that motor processes (1) are recruited to understand language that focuses on actions and (2) contribute a unique element to conceptual representation. This article explores the role of this motor recruitment in language comprehension. It concludes that extant findings are consistent with the theorized existence of multimodal, embodied representations of the referents of words and the meaning carried by language. Further, an integrative conceptualization of “fault tolerant comprehension” is proposed.


2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrike K. Blumenfeld ◽  
James R. Booth ◽  
Douglas D. Burman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document