Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations for the Assessment and Treatment of Chronic Tic Disorders

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Murphy ◽  
A. B. Lewin ◽  
E. A. Storch ◽  
S. Stock
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Tic Disorders ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Chronic Tic Disorders

Evidence-based treatment of Tourette’s disorder and chronic tic disorders

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1103-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joey Ka-Yee Essoe ◽  
Marco A. Grados ◽  
Harvey S. Singer ◽  
Nicholas S. Myers ◽  
Joseph F. McGuire
Keyword(s):  
Tic Disorders ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Tourette’S Disorder ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Tourette's Disorder ◽  
Chronic Tic Disorders

scholarly journals Conformance to Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations in Schizophrenia Treatment Services

2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 317-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Addington ◽  
Emily McKenzie ◽  
Harvey Smith ◽  
Henry Chuang ◽  
Stephen Boucher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Treatment Services

scholarly journals Authors’ response to “Tranexamic acid and uremic bleeding: evidence-based treatment recommendations”

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. E3-E3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J Hedges ◽  
Sarah B Dehoney ◽  
Justin S Hooper ◽  
Jamshid Amanzadeh ◽  
Anthony J Busti
Keyword(s):  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment

Early experience with IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) cognitive computing system for lung and colorectal cancer treatment.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8527-8527 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.P. Somashekhar ◽  
Martín-J. Sepúlveda ◽  
Andrew D Norden ◽  
Amit Rauthan ◽  
Kumar Arun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Computing System ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
Cognitive Computing ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Tumour Board ◽  
Ibm Watson

8527 Background: IBM Watson for Oncology is an artificial intelligence cognitive computing system that provides confidence-ranked, evidence-based treatment recommendations for cancer. In the present study, we examine the level of agreement for lung and colorectal cancer therapy between the multidisciplinary tumour board from Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre in Bangalore, India, and Watson for Oncology. Methods: Watson for Oncology is a Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, USA) trained cognitive computing system that uses natural language processing and machine learning to provide treatment recommendations. It processes structured and unstructured data from medical literature, treatment guidelines, medical records, imaging, lab and pathology reports, and the expertise of Memorial Sloan Kettering experts to formulate therapeutic recommendations. Treatment recommendations are provided in three categories: recommended, for consideration and not recommended. In this report we provide the results of the independent and blinded evaluation by the multidisciplinary tumour board and Watson for Oncology of 362 total cancer cases comprised of 112 lung, 126 colon and 124 rectal cancers seen at the Centre within the last three years. The recommendations of the two agents were compared for agreement and considered concordant when the tumour board recommendation was included in the recommended or for consideration categories of the treatment advisor. Results: Overall, treatment recommendations were concordant in 96.4% of lung, 81.0% of colon and 92.7% of rectal cancer cases. By tumour stage, treatment recommendations were concordant in 88.9% of localized and 97.9% of metastatic lung cancer, 85.5% of localized and 76.6% of metastatic colon cancer, and 96.8% of localized and 80.6% of metastatic rectal cancer. Conclusions: Treatment recommendations made by the Manipal multidisciplinary tumour board and Watson for Oncology were highly concordant in the cancers examined. This cognitive computing technology holds much promise in helping oncologists make information intensive, evidence based treatment decisions.

scholarly journals Diabetic macular oedema: evidence-based treatment recommendations for Asian countries

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemmy CM Cheung ◽  
Young Hee Yoon ◽  
Lee Jen Chen ◽  
Shih Jen Chen ◽  
Tara M George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Oedema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Oedema ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment

Comments on Yaruss, LaSalle, and Conture (1998)

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne K. Cordes
Keyword(s):  
Relevant Information ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Training Clinic ◽  
Minimal Information ◽  
Assessment And Diagnosis

In summary, Yaruss et al. have contributed to the literature a set of “recommendation categories” that were based on retrospective analyses of minimal information from children who might have stuttered, gathered originally by student clinicians in one training clinic who were entirely unaware that their data would be used to develop recommendations for other children in other clinics. These categories and recommendations might have led to inaccurate decisions about a significant minority of the children involved in this study (Yaruss et al.’s Footnote 1), but “suggested treatment recommendations” are nevertheless presented as “useful for clinicians to consider” (p. 73).Given some indications that delaying treatment for children who stutter may reduce the effectiveness of any eventual treatment (R. J. Ingham & Cordes, 1999), the decision not to recommend treatment after an initial stuttering evaluation is an important one. The evidence used to support such a decision should be strong, developed from well-designed, carefully executed, and conservatively interpreted studies. Yaruss et al. (1998) presented some information for clinicians to consider, and other relevant information has been presented in other recent forums (e.g., Curlee & Yairi, 1997, and commentaries). I suggest only that clinicians might also want to consider that the literature on stuttering assessment and diagnosis is already full of data-based information and some relatively carefully developed recommendations (see Adams, 1980; Costello & R. J. Ingham, 1984; Culatta & Goldberg, 1995; Curlee, 1993; J. C. Ingham & Riley, 1998; Ryan, 1992). It is critical to note, as well, that essentially all of these sources would recommend treatment for more children sooner than the recommendations presented by Yaruss et al. would do. The phrase “evidence-based treatment” has become popular in the time since Yaruss et al.’s (1998) article was published; the point for children who stutter, and for all of our other clients, is that all of our decisions and recommendations should always

Evidence-based treatment recommendations for uremic bleeding

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J Hedges ◽  
Sarah B Dehoney ◽  
Justin S Hooper ◽  
Jamshid Amanzadeh ◽  
Anthony J Busti
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment

Unified Protocols for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Ehrenreich-May ◽  
Sarah M. Kennedy ◽  
Jamie A. Sherman ◽  
Emily L. Bilek ◽  
Brian A. Buzzella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Emotional Disorders ◽  
Depressive Disorders ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Tic Disorders ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Transdiagnostic Treatment ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive Disorders

The therapy manuals included in this volume—the Unified Protocols for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children (UP-C) and Adolescents (UP-A)—include evidence-based treatment strategies to assist child and adolescent clients to function better in their lives. The manuals include specific guidelines for treatment delivery, and they also contain information about how to introduce parent-directed strategies to help promote long-term uptake of youth-directed therapy skills. The evidence-based treatment skills presented may be applied by therapists to children and adolescents with a wide variety of emotional disorders. This treatment guide takes a transdiagnostic approach to the treatment of emotional disorders. Some of the disorders that may be targeted include anxiety disorders and depressive disorders. This treatment is flexible enough for use with some trauma and stress-related disorders (including adjustment disorders), somatic symptom disorders, tic disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorders. The transdiagnostic presentation of evidence-based intervention techniques within these treatments may be particularly useful for children and adolescents presenting with multiple emotional disorders or mixed/subclinical symptoms of several emotional disorders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document