Nurturing healthy human development: A preferred perspective for action towards population health promotion

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq Bhatti
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 668-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valéria Troncoso Baltar ◽  
Clóvis Arlindo de Sousa ◽  
Marcia Faria Westphal

In observational epidemiology it is usual to select a control group to study the effects of certain exposures on human health. Intervention studies are well known among epidemiologists but it is not very frequent in other areas of research. In this paper we propose the same idea of intervention studies and the use of three methods for a health promotion research control group selection: Propensity score, Mahalanobis' distance and Mahalanobis within Propensity Calipers. In the original project, "Health and Local Development: a progress review towards the millennium goals with relation to health in the Brazilian cities which develop social agendas", cities with social agendas from Brazil were matched separately by state. In the state of Paraná there are 397 cities. Of these, 34 presented social agendas implemented and active since, at least, 2004. Five variables measured in 2000 were considered for the matching: population size, human development index of income, human development index of education, percentage of literacy and vaccine coverage. As a result, among these three methods, the Mahalanobis by itself was considered the less efficient. In conclusion, the propensity, which is a very simple linear score, presented very good matched sample. However, the Mahalanobis within Calipers was the method that provided the best result.


Medical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda L. Brewster ◽  
Traci L. Wilson ◽  
Leslie A. Curry ◽  
Suzanne R. Kunkel

2020 ◽  
pp. 91-106
Author(s):  
Ted Brown ◽  
Carolynne White ◽  
Mong-Lin Yu ◽  
Celia Marston

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Voigt

AbstractThe use of incentives to encourage individuals to adopt ‘healthier’ behaviours is an increasingly popular instrument in health policy. Much of the literature has been critical of ‘negative’ incentives, often due to concerns about equality; ‘positive’ incentives, however, have largely been welcomed as an instrument for the improvement of population health and possibly the reduction of health inequalities. The aim of this paper is to provide a more systematic assessment of the use of incentives from the perspective of equality. The paper begins with an overview of existing and proposed incentive schemes. I then suggest that the distinction between ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ incentives – or ‘carrots’ and ‘sticks’ – is of limited use in distinguishing those incentive schemes that raise concerns of equality from those that do not. The paper assesses incentive schemes with respect to two important considerations of equality: equality of access and equality of outcomes. While our assessment of incentive schemes will, ultimately, depend on various empirical facts, the paper aims to advance the debate by identifying some of the empirical questions we need to ask. The paper concludes by considering a number of trade-offs and caveats relevant to the assessment of incentive schemes.


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-227
Author(s):  
Peter Howat ◽  
Bruce Maycock ◽  
Donna Cross ◽  
Jenny Collins ◽  
Linda Jackson ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Barr ◽  
Sylvia Robinson ◽  
Brenda Marin-Link ◽  
Lisa Underhill ◽  
Anita Dotts ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Paul E. Terry

If you ask most health professionals why they do what they do, they invariably speak of being of service. And being of service, for population health workers, becomes ever more meaningful as our work touches ever more lives. To wit, “Kaizen,” a Japanese term meaning “change for better,” sits shoulder to shoulder with our life’s purpose. Health promotion professionals are high performers getting great results but we need to start working on our work. What would it take to increase our impact by 50%? And when we change our processes to accomplish that, what would we change next to get another 50% improvement? Only by stepping back and examining our processes can we see the time and motion required to make what’s working now work better and be more accessible to more people next time.


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (spe) ◽  
pp. 867-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Helena dos Santos Oliveira ◽  
Maria Adelane Alves Monteiro ◽  
Maria do Socorro Vieira Lopes ◽  
Daniele Mary Silva de Brito ◽  
Neiva Francenely Cunha Vieira ◽  
...  

The population impoverishment is a social reality whose overcoming is necessary so that we can think about health as a positive concept. This study proposes a reflection on the coping strategies adopted by the Conjunto Palmeira, a Brazilian community in the Northeast, and their interface with health promotion. This community's reality is an example of overcoming social exclusion for different regions of Brazil and other countries. The history of the Conjunto and the collective strategies of empowerment for coping with poverty and search for human development are initially presented. After that, we establish the relationship of those strategies with the action fields for health promotion. Finally, we consider that the mutual responsibility of the community with its health and its relationship with the environment in which they live are means of promoting transformation towards the conquest of a worthy social space.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document