Nominations sought for Livable Communities Awards

2007 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Marlon Boarnet ◽  
Randall C. Crane

Can transportation problems be fixed by the right neighborhood design? The tremendous popularity of the "new urbanism" and "livable communities" initiatives suggests that many persons think so. As a systematic assessment of attempts to solve transportation problems through urban design, this book asks and answers three questions: Can such efforts work? Will they be put into practice? Are they a good idea?


2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina M. Silverstein ◽  
Elizabeth Johns ◽  
Judith A. Griffin
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 71-112
Author(s):  
Laura M. Keyes ◽  
Abraham David Benavides
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunju Hwang ◽  
Ann Ziebarth
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Turner ◽  
Stacy Cannon

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to set out the history and origins of dementia-friendly communities (DFCs) and age-friendly communities (AFCs) in the UK, the differing frameworks and how they compare, and set out some key messages about how they might learn from each other. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a summary piece written by leaders in the two fields. Findings It aims to reduce potential confusion around AFCs and DFCs, and provides some practical ways that the two initiatives might work together and find common ground. By learning from each other, both age-friendly and DFCs can grow their reach and their impact as complementary, and not competing, programmes. Originality/value The original development of some of the ideas in this paper comes from a paper Natalie Turner co-wrote with Lydia Morken at AARP (www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/livable-communities/documents-2016/Better-Together-Research-Report.pdf). For this paper, the authors reviewed the approach within the UK context and have furthered and added to the original insights.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Zhang ◽  
Mildred E. Warner ◽  
Stephanie Firestone

The rapid pace of population aging in cities around the world demands that planners design communities that are livable for people of all ages and abilities. In 2017, to assess progress toward this end, AARP and the International Division of the American Planning Association conducted a global survey of planners on their efforts to incorporate a livable-communityfor-all-ages approach into their work. The survey of 559 planners measured motivators, barriers, strategies for engagement and practices facilitating planners’ work on livable communities for all ages (LCA). Using the international survey, we analyze factors driving local governments’ actions to advance LCA, and factors driving outcomes incorporating a livablecommunity-for-all-ages approach in planning practices. We show how these differ between the US and non-US respondents, including how US suburbs and rural areas lag in actions toward LCA. Regression results show that local motivations such as awareness of substantial growth in older populations is a primary factor motivating local governments to take more actions. While physical design is a critical part of the solution, we find that facilitating practices and community engagement in the process are key to advancing planning for age-friendly communities. Additionally, communities that practice more traditional approaches to planning and have limited resources actually exhibit a higher level of LCA outcomes. This suggests that focusing on community engagement and facilitating practices could be a promising approach to incorporating an all age lens in planning practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document