Report from the Task Force on issues in research in the psychology of women: The APA Open Symposia

1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan McCandless ◽  
◽  
Wendy McKenna ◽  
Sarah Lawrence ◽  
Susan R. Sacks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Psychology Of Women

Task Force on Curriculum Issues: Make a Difference in Your Undergraduate Curriculum: Add a Psychology of Women Gender Class

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Yoder ◽  
Olga Favreau ◽  
Susan Basow ◽  
Joan Chrisler ◽  
Bonnie Moradi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Undergraduate Curriculum ◽  
Psychology Of Women ◽  
Curriculum Issues

Open Science and Feminist Ethics: Promises and Challenges of Open Access

2021 ◽  
pp. 036168432110309
Author(s):  
Mary M. Brabeck
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Feminist Ethics ◽  
Psychology Of Women ◽  
Recent Scholarship ◽  
Access Policies ◽  
Policies And Practices

Open science advocates argue that making data sets, studies, methodologies, and other aspects of research free from publication fees and available to scholars will increase collaborations, access, and dissemination of knowledge. In this article, I argue that open access policies and practices raise both feminist and ethical issues. I reflect on the five themes of feminist ethics identified 20 years ago by a task force of the Society for the Psychology of Women. I update the themes with recent scholarship of feminist philosophers and ethicists, and I use the themes to raise questions about the promises and challenges of open access. Throughout, I offer suggestions for all who seek to make knowledge of human psychology more complete and more accessible to more people. I conclude by offering recommendations informed by feminist ethics to those building the policies and practices of open access.

Report of the ADEA president's task force on the Surgeon General's report on oral health. American Dental Education Association

2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. 708-714
Author(s):  
PJ Ferrillo ◽  
KB Chance ◽  
RI Garcia ◽  
WE Kerschbaum ◽  
JJ Koelbl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Health ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Dental Education ◽  
Education Association

Hot Topics: A Report From the Division 4 Task Force on Fluency Services in the Schools

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-13
Author(s):  
Lisa Scott-Trautman ◽  
Kristin A. Chmela
Keyword(s):  
Task Force

Entrapment Neuropathies: Electrodiagnostic Criteria

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Jay Blaisdell ◽  
James B. Talmage
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Conduction ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Conduction Block ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Conduction Delay ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Sixth Edition ◽  
Entrapment Neuropathies ◽  
Axon Loss ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract Like the diagnosis-based impairment (DBI) method and the range-of-motion (ROM) method for rating permanent impairment, the approach for rating compression or entrapment neuropathy in the upper extremity (eg, carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS]) is a separate and distinct methodology in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition. Rating entrapment neuropathies is similar to the DBI method because the evaluator uses three grade modifiers (ie, test findings, functional history, and physical evaluation findings), but the way these modifiers are applied is different from that in the DBI method. Notably, the evaluator must have valid nerve conduction test results and cannot diagnose or rate nerve entrapment or compression without them; postoperative nerve conduction studies are not necessary for impairment rating purposes. The AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, uses criteria that match those established by the Normative Data Task Force and endorsed by the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM); evaluators should be aware of updated definitions of normal from AANEM. It is possible that some patients may be diagnosed with carpal or cubital tunnel syndrome for treatment but will not qualify for that diagnosis for impairment rating; evaluating physicians must be familiar with electrodiagnostic test results to interpret them and determine if they confirm to the criteria for conduction delay, conduction block, or axon loss; if this is not the case, the evaluator may use the DBI method with the diagnosis of nonspecific pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document