A Comparison of Curriculum-Based Measurement and Standardized Achievement Tests on the Prediction of Future Academic and Behavioral Performance

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystyna Bienia ◽  
Emily Cox ◽  
Jennifer Dimbath ◽  
Jackie Hallman ◽  
Alyson Hoegler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achievement Tests ◽  
Curriculum Based Measurement ◽  
Behavioral Performance ◽  
Standardized Achievement Tests

Measuring Pupil Progress: A Comparison of Standardized Achievement Tests and Curriculum-Related Measures

Diagnostique ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Marston ◽  
Lynn S. Fuchs ◽  
Stanley L. Deno
Keyword(s):  
Achievement Tests ◽  
Standardized Achievement Tests

Testing Students' Ability to Do Geometric Proofs: A Comparison of Three Objective Item Types

1971 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-217
Author(s):  
Gerald S. Hanna
Keyword(s):  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Achievement Tests ◽  
Formal Proofs ◽  
Experimental Item ◽  
Standardized Achievement Tests ◽  
Item Types ◽  
Objective Item

In final geometry examinations and in standardized achievement tests, scoring convenience often precludes the use of formal student-produced proofs. This study sought objective item types that would as nearly as possible measure the same abilities as those measured by student-produced formal proofs. A test of conventional proofs was used to compare the concurrent validity of 3 objective item types. Significant differences among the experimental item types were found.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document