✓ New medical knowledge is emerging at a tremendous rate. Diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, cancer, and others (diseases once considered beyond the scope of medicine) are receiving a great deal of attention. Yet it is a paradox that, at a time when we are learning more about the biology of the human being, it is more difficult to creatively develop the new knowledge into diagnostic tests, surgical interventions, and preventive strategies.
The pace of biomedical innovation is being slowed by an increase in the intervention of nonmedical “managers of care.” The driving force behind managed care is concern over cost. The managers of medical care have sought to control costs by controlling the doctor's decision making. This is the focus of managed care. The physicians of today, therefore, face a remarkable challenge. They must respond to the needs of patients while being held accountable to an increasing number of overseers in the public and private sectors. These managers of care justify their activities on the notion that the patient will be better off and the cost less if the doctor-patient encounter is regulated by protocols, statistical comparison, utilization review, and fee schedules.
While doctor's decisions are being managed by others, who is managing the managers? The answer should be the medical community, principally doctors. Unfortunately, the answer at the moment is the payors — governmental reimbursement agencies, intermediaries, employers, hospitals, or new corporations designed to manage medical costs. The challenge to the physician is to retain the responsibility for those things for which he or she is held accountable. The challenge should not be ignored.
A Theory of Utilization Review