Constructivist Self-Development Theory

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Ciali
2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Williams ◽  
Heather Helm ◽  
Elysia Clemens

Scholars have identified vicarious traumatization (VT) as one of the most extreme effects of working with traumatized clients; however, not all mental health therapists develop VT (Pearlman & Saakvitne, 1995). Path analytic procedures were used to assess a comprehensive theoretical VT model based on constructivist self-development theory (CSDT). The model explained 46% of the variance in VT in mental health therapists surveyed.


1987 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven S. Ivy

Details and recommends an assessment model based on the faith development theory of James Fowler and the self development theory of Robert Kegan. Provides pastoral diagnostic criteria in the areas of symbolic communication, in styles of community, and for style-specific pastoral care. Offers a brief case to illustrate one part of the model.


2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison N. Ponce ◽  
Michelle K. Williams ◽  
George J. Allen

Links exist between being subjected to maltreatment as a child and tendencies to accept violence as normative in adult relationships. Constructivist Self Development Theory suggests that such relationships may be affected by “cognitive disruptions” in “self” and “other” schemas. Mediating effects of distorted cognitive schemas on the association between history of child maltreatment and the acceptance of violence in intimate interpersonal relationships were investigated among 433 men and women. Outcomes indicated that individuals who reported childhood maltreatment were more likely to display distortions in their cognitive schemas and those individuals with disrupted schemas were more likely to accept relationship violence. Least-square multiple regression analyses revealed that distorted beliefs fully mediated the relationship between reporting childhood maltreatment and acceptance of violence, for both men and women. Subsidiary analyses suggested that this full mediation was replicated for schemas involving the self but not for schemas about others.


GeroPsych ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Chu ◽  
Daniel Grühn ◽  
Ashley M. Holland

Abstract. We investigated the effects of time horizon and age on the socioemotional motives underlying individual’s bucket-list goals. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three time-horizon conditions to make a bucket list: (1) an open-ended time horizon (Study 1 & 2), (2) a 6-month horizon (i.e., “Imagine you have 6 months to live”; Study 1 & 2), and (3) a 1-week horizon (Study 2). Goal motives were coded based on socioemotional selectivity theory and psychosocial development theory. Results indicated that time horizon and age produced unique effects on bucket-list goal motives. Extending past findings on people’s motives considering the end of life, the findings suggest that different time horizons and life stages trigger different motives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document