Autonomous and controlled motivation for interpersonal therapy for depression: Between-therapists and within-therapist effects.

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 525-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Zuroff ◽  
Carolina McBride ◽  
Paula Ravitz ◽  
Richard Koestner ◽  
D. S. Moskowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapist Effects ◽  
Interpersonal Therapy ◽  
Controlled Motivation ◽  
Autonomous And Controlled Motivation

Autonomous and controlled motivation and interpersonal therapy for depression: Moderating role of recurrent depression

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina. McBride ◽  
David C. Zuroff ◽  
Paula. Ravitz ◽  
Richard. Koestner ◽  
Debbie S. Moskowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recurrent Depression ◽  
Interpersonal Therapy ◽  
Controlled Motivation ◽  
Moderating Role ◽  
Autonomous And Controlled Motivation

scholarly journals A within-person approach to the relation between quality of task motivation, performance and job satisfaction in everyday working life

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen Hogenelst ◽  
Roos Schelvis ◽  
Tanja Krone ◽  
Marylène Gagné ◽  
Matti Toivo Juhani Heino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Autonomous Motivation ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Network Analyses ◽  
Controlled Motivation ◽  
Work Tasks ◽  
White Collar Workers ◽  
Autonomous And Controlled Motivation

Previous research on work-related motivation and work-related outcomes generally shows that autonomous forms of motivation are associated with higher performance and job satisfaction, whereas controlled forms of motivation are generally linked to worse outcomes. These relationships are largely based on between-persons data from cross-sectional studies or longitudinal studies with few measurement points. However, motivation quality, performance, and job satisfaction can vary considerably from day to day, both between and within individuals. The present study therefore combines between-persons and within-persons approaches to study the relationships between motivation, performance, and job satisfaction. Nineteen white-collar workers participated in the study. With a default protocol of 30 working days, an ecological momentary assessment app prompted participants five times a day to report their autonomous and controlled motivation for work tasks and their productivity and job satisfaction at the end of each day. Fourteen participants gathered sufficient data to compute within-person relations and individual networks. At the between person level, autonomous motivation was positively associated with productivity, whereas no association with job satisfaction was detected. No associations were detected between controlled motivation and productivity or job satisfaction. At group level within persons, (a) motivation during work tasks (autonomous or controlled) was not associated with self-reported productivity or job satisfaction at the end of that day, (b) self-reported productivity at the end of a day was negatively related to next day autonomous and controlled motivation, and (c) end of day job satisfaction was positively related to next day controlled motivation, but not autonomous motivation. Individual network analyses indicated considerable interindividual heterogeneity, especially in the relationships between motivation and job satisfaction. In conclusion, these findings point to significant variability in the observed relations between motivation, performance and job satisfaction, and highlight the added value of a within person approach and individual networks in addition to between-persons approaches. The implications of these findings for occupational wellbeing research are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document