Object permanence in the pigeon (Columba livia): Insertion of a delay prior to choice facilitates visible- and invisible-displacement accuracy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Zentall ◽  
Olivia L. Raley
1995 ◽  
Vol 80 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1059-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Heishman ◽  
Mindy Conant ◽  
Robert Pasnak

Two adult cats were tested on multiple invisible displacement. A dowel was established as a secondary reinforcer and hidden in a manner similar to that used to assess the culmination of sensorimotor intelligence in human infants. Three other cats were tested on single invisible displacement, a simpler version of the task. For human infants, this task is used to assess the beginning of mental representation in the sixth and last stage of sensorimotor intelligence. The cats' searches on these tasks were consistent with representation of an unsensed object and fully developed sensorimotor intelligence.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Johnson ◽  
Jess Sullivan ◽  
Cara Buck ◽  
Julie Trexel ◽  
Michael Scarpuzzi

Anticipating the location of a temporarily obscured target—what Piaget (the construction of reality in the child. Basic Books, New York, 1954) called ‘‘objectpermanence’’—is a critical skill, especially in hunters of mobile prey. Previous research with bottlenose dolphins found they could predict the location of a target that had been visibly displaced into an opaque container, but not one that was first placed in an opaque container and then invisibly displaced to another container. We tested whether, by altering the task to involve occlusion rather than containment, these animals could show more advanced object permanence skills. We projected dynamic visual displays at an underwater-viewing window and videotaped the animals’ head moves while observing these displays. In Experiment 1, the animals observed a small black disk moving behind occluders that shifted in size, ultimately forming one large occluder. Nine out of ten subjects ‘‘tracked’’ the presumed movement of the disk behind this occluder on their first trial—and in a statistically significant number of subsequent trials—confirming their visible displacement abilities. In Experiment 2, we tested their invisible displacement abilities. The disk first disappeared behind a pair of moving occluders, which then moved behind a stationary occluder. The moving occluders then reappeared and separated, revealing that the disk was no longer behind them. The subjects subsequently looked to the correct stationary occluder on eight of their ten first trials, and in a statistically significant number of subsequent trials. Thus, by altering the stimuli to be more ecologically valid, we were able to show that the dolphins could indeed succeed at an invisible displacement task.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miléna Trösch ◽  
Anna Flamand ◽  
Manon Chasles ◽  
Raymond Nowak ◽  
Ludovic Calandreau ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-140
Author(s):  
Anna Gabel ◽  
Carsten Lucass ◽  
Stefanie M. Zimmer ◽  
Christina Bietz ◽  
Maren Schwenke ◽  
...  

Object permanence tests are a standard procedure to test the cognitive ability to mentally follow a hidden object. To test this capacity in mandrills, we used visible and color-tracking with invisible displacement tests. During visible displacement the object was hidden and moved within its container in full view of the tested individual. During color-tracking with invisible displacement the object was hidden in a colored container, also in full view, but then moved within its container out of view. The tested mandrills were successful in the visible but not in the color-tracking with invisible displacement tests. They did not use the color as a cue for the correct container. One of the animals memorized the position of the container, in which the reward was dropped before the invisible displacement. We assume that the capacity of solving invisible displacement tests has evolved after the evolutionary separation of mandrills and apes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. C. Miller ◽  
C. D. Gipson ◽  
A. Vaughan ◽  
R. Rayburn-Reeves ◽  
T. R. Zentall

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman

Abstract The authors’ arguments reflect the dominant traditions of American Psychology. In doing so, however, they miss relevant insights omitted during the original importation (translation and popularization) of the foreign sources that informed the theories they built upon. Of particular relevance here are Piaget's last studies. These are presented to unpack the meaning of “object permanence” as a kind of representation.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly C. Miller ◽  
Kristina L. Pattison ◽  
Rebecca M. Rayburnreeves ◽  
Thomas R. Zentall
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Neiworth ◽  
Eric Steinmark ◽  
Catherine Dehart ◽  
Frances Steely

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document