scholarly journals Time to lay the Libet experiment to rest: Commentary on Papanicolaou (2017).

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Kihlstrom
Keyword(s):  
Libet Experiment

scholarly journals Investigating motor preparatory processes and conscious volition using machine learning

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan Hall ◽  
Dawie van den Heever ◽  
Mikkel C. Vinding ◽  
Linzette Morris
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Conscious Awareness ◽  
Libet Experiment ◽  
Broad Term ◽  
Eeg Data ◽  
Intention To Move ◽  
The Moment

AbstractBackgroundConscious volition is a broad term and is difficult to reduce to a single empirical paradigm. It encompasses many areas of cognition, including decision-making and empirical studies can be done on these components. This work follows on the seminal work of Libet et al. (1983) which focused on brain activity preceding motor activity and conscious awareness of the intention to move. Previous results have subsequently faced criticism, particularly methods used to average out EEG data over all the trials and the readiness potential not being present on an individual trial basis. This following study aims to address these criticisms.ObjectivesTo use machine learning to investigate brain activity preceding left/right hand movements with relation to conscious intent and motor action.MethodologyThe data collection involved the recreation of the Libet experiment, with electroencephalography (EEG) data being collected. An addition made in this study was the choice between “left” and “right” while observing the Libet clock to subjectively mark the moment of conscious awareness. Twenty-one participants were included (four females, all right-handed). A deep (machine) learning model known as a convolutional neural network (CNN) was used for the EEG data analysis.ResultsSubjectively reported conscious intent preceded the action by 108 ms. The CNN model was able to predict the decision “left” or “right” as early as 4.45 seconds before the action with a test accuracy of 98%.ConclusionThis study has shown motor preparatory processes start up to 4.45 seconds before conscious awareness of a decision to move.

scholarly journals Free will and (in)determinism in the brain: a case for naturalized philosophy

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-364
Author(s):  
Louis Vervoort ◽  
Tomasz Blusiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Free Will ◽  
Typical Case ◽  
Free Agent ◽  
Libet Experiment ◽  
Scientific Disciplines ◽  
Neuronal Processes ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Conceptual Work

In this article we study the question of free will from an interdisciplinary angle, drawing on philosophy, neurobiology and physics. We start by reviewing relevant neurobiological findings on the functioning of the brain, notably as presented in (Koch 2009); we assess these against the physics of (in)determinism. These biophysics findings seem to indicate that neuronal processes are not quantum but classical in nature. We conclude from this that there is little support for the existence of an immaterial ‘mind’, capable of ruling over matter independently of the causal past. But what, then, can free will be ? We propose a compatibilist account that resonates well with neurobiology and physics, and that highlights that free will comes in degrees – degrees which vary with the conscious grasp the ‘free’ agent has over his actions. Finally, we analyze the well-known Libet experiment on free will through the lens of our model. We submit this interdisciplinary investigation as a typical case of naturalized philosophy: in our theorizing we privilege assumptions that find evidence in science, but our conceptual work also suggests new avenues for research in a few scientific disciplines. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document