The effect of selective attention and a stimulus prefix on the output order of immediate free recall of short and long lists.

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Grenfell-Essam ◽  
Geoff Ward
Keyword(s):  
Free Recall ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Output Order

scholarly journals Output order and variability in free recall are linked to cognitive ability and hippocampal volume in elderly individuals

2016 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 126-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Bruno ◽  
Michel J. Grothe ◽  
Jay Nierenberg ◽  
John J. Sidtis ◽  
Stefan J. Teipel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Free Recall ◽  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Hippocampal Volume ◽  
Output Order ◽  
Elderly Individuals

scholarly journals Comparison of output order in free recall

1974 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis M. Flores ◽  
Sam C. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Free Recall ◽  
Output Order

Selective Attention and the Three-Process Memory Model for the Interpretation of Verbal Free Recall in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foteini Christidi ◽  
Ioannis Zalonis ◽  
Nikolaos Smyrnis ◽  
Ioannis Evdokimidis
Keyword(s):  
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ◽  
Free Recall ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Verbal Learning ◽  
Hierarchical Regression ◽  
Delayed Recall ◽  
Neuropsychological Screening ◽  
Memory Processes ◽  
Sporadic Als ◽  
Lateral Sclerosis

AbstractThe present study investigates selective attention and verbal free recall in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and examines the contribution of selective attention, encoding, consolidation, and retrieval memory processes to patients’ verbal free recall. We examined 22 non-demented patients with sporadic ALS and 22 demographically related controls using Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test (SNST; selective attention) and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT; immediate & delayed verbal free recall). The item-specific deficit approach (ISDA) was applied to RAVLT to evaluate encoding, consolidation, and retrieval difficulties. ALS patients performed worse than controls on SNST (p < .001) and RAVLT immediate and delayed recall (p < .001) and showed deficient encoding (p = .001) and consolidation (p = .002) but not retrieval (p = .405). Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that SNST and ISDA indices accounted for: (a) 91.1% of the variance in RAVLT immediate recall, with encoding (p = .016), consolidation (p < .001), and retrieval (p = .032) significantly contributing to the overall model and the SNST alone accounting for 41.6%; and (b) 85.2% of the variance in RAVLT delayed recall, with consolidation (p < .001) and retrieval (p = .008) significantly contributing to the overall model and the SNST alone accounting for 39.8%. Thus, selective attention, encoding, and consolidation, and to a lesser extent of retrieval, influenced both immediate and delayed verbal free recall. Concluding, selective attention and the memory processes of encoding, consolidation, and retrieval should be considered while interpreting patients’ impaired free recall. (JINS, 2012, 18, 1–10)

Epistemology and Counterintuitiveness: Role and Relationship in Epidemiology of Cultural Representations

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 289-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Barrett ◽  
Justin Gregory
Keyword(s):  
Free Recall ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Cultural Representations ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Immediate Recall ◽  
Control Concept

AbstractForty-nine members of the Oxford public took part in a controlled free-recall experiment, the first 'minimal counterintuitiveness theory' study to control concept inferential potential and participant selective-attention timing. Recall of counterintuitive ideas (MCI) was compared with recall of ideas expressing necessary epistemic incongruence (i.e., analytically false), analytically true ideas, and ordinary control ideas. The items expressing necessary epistemic incongruence had better recall than other items. MCI items had a mnemonic advantage over intuitive templates for participants twenty-five years and younger after a one-week delay, but MCI items did not have an advantage for older participants. There was no mnemonic advantage for immediate recall of MCI items in any age group. Analyses suggest this general failure to replicate previously found mnemonic advantages may have been due to restricting the items' inferential potential.

The Relation of Output Order and Commission Errors in Free Recall and Eyewitness Accounts

Memory ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bennett L. Schwartz ◽  
Ronald P. Fisher ◽  
Kellye S. Hebert
Keyword(s):  
Free Recall ◽  
Output Order ◽  
Commission Errors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document