Weight bias as a social justice issue: A call for dialogue.

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Nutter ◽  
Shelly Russell-Mayhew ◽  
Nancy Arthur ◽  
John H. Ellard
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Nutter ◽  
Shelly Russell-Mayhew ◽  
Nancy Arthur ◽  
John H. Ellard
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nancy Arthur ◽  
Darren Lund ◽  
Shelly Russell-Mayhew ◽  
Sarah Nutter ◽  
Emily Williams ◽  
...  

Researchers often focus on the content of their research interests but, depending on the research approach, may pay less attention to the process of locating themselves in relation to the research topic. This paper outlines the dialogue between an interdisciplinary team of researchers who were at the initial stages of forming a research agenda related to weight bias and social justice. Using a polyethnographic approach to guide our discussion, we sought to explore the diverse and common life experiences that influenced our professional interests for pursuing research on weight bias. As a dialogic method, polyethnography is ideally suited for the reflexive work required of researchers seeking to address issues of equity and social justice. Beyond more traditional approaches such as journaling, personal interviews, or researcher notes, the intersubjectivity highlighted by this method affords a richer space for exploration, challenging ideas, taking risks, and collectively interrogating both self and society. Following a discussion of positionality, the dialogue between researchers is presented, followed by their critique of the discussion, informed by professional literature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-114
Author(s):  
Sarah Nutter ◽  
Shelly Russell-Mayhew ◽  
John H. Ellard ◽  
Nancy Arthur

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Nutter ◽  
Shelly Russell-Mayhew ◽  
Angela S. Alberga ◽  
Nancy Arthur ◽  
Anusha Kassan ◽  
...  

Weight bias is a form of stigma with detrimental effects on the health and wellness of individuals with large bodies. Researchers from various disciplines have recognized weight bias as an important topic for public health and for professional practice. To date, researchers from various areas have approached weight bias from independent perspectives and from differing theoretical orientations. In this paper, we examined the similarities and differences between three perspectives (i.e., weight-centric, non-weight-centric (health-centric), and health at every size) used to understand weight bias and approach weight bias research with regard to (a) language about people with large bodies, (b) theoretical position, (c) identified consequences of weight bias, and (d) identified influences on weight-based social inequity. We suggest that, despite differences, each perspective acknowledges the negative influences that position weight as being within individual control and the negative consequences of weight bias. We call for recognition and discussion of weight bias as a social justice issue in order to change the discourse and professional practices extended towards individuals with large bodies. We advocate for an emphasis on social justice as a uniting framework for interdisciplinary research on weight bias.


2019 ◽  
Vol 227 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Sandro Gomes Pessoa ◽  
Linda Liebenberg ◽  
Dorothy Bottrell ◽  
Silvia Helena Koller

Abstract. Economic changes in the context of globalization have left adolescents from Latin American contexts with few opportunities to make satisfactory transitions into adulthood. Recent studies indicate that there is a protracted period between the end of schooling and entering into formal working activities. While in this “limbo,” illicit activities, such as drug trafficking may emerge as an alternative for young people to ensure their social participation. This article aims to deepen the understanding of Brazilian youth’s involvement in drug trafficking and its intersection with their schooling, work, and aspirations, connecting with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 4 and 16 as proposed in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted by the United Nations in 2015 .


1977 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 934-935
Author(s):  
JACK D. FORBES
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (8) ◽  
pp. 778-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick T. L. Leong ◽  
Wade E. Pickren ◽  
Melba J. T. Vasquez
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document