Suffering in silence: Investigating the role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence.

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 731-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Kiewitz ◽  
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog ◽  
Mindy K. Shoss ◽  
Patrick Raymund James M. Garcia ◽  
Robert L. Tang
Keyword(s):  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
The Relationship

The role of abusive supervision and organizational commitment on employees' information security policy noncompliance intention

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1383-1405
Author(s):  
Bowen Guan ◽  
Carol Hsu
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Commitment ◽  
Security Policy ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Continuance Commitment ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the association between abusive supervision and employees' information security policy (ISP) noncompliance intention, building on affective commitment, normative commitment and continuance commitment. The study also examines the moderating effect of perceived certainty and severity of sanctions on the relationship between the three dimensions of organizational commitment and ISP noncompliance intention.Design/methodology/approachSurvey methodology was used for data collection through a well-designed online questionnaire. Data was analyzed using the structural equation model with Amos v. 22.0 software.FindingsThis study demonstrates that abusive supervision has a significant, negative impact on affective, normative and continuance commitment, and the three dimensions of organizational commitment are negatively associated with employees' ISP noncompliance intention. Results also indicate that the moderating effect of perceived severity of sanctions is significant, and perceived certainty of sanctions plays a positive moderating role in the relationship between affective commitment and employees' ISP noncompliance intention.Practical implicationsFindings of this research are beneficial for organizational management in the relationships between supervisors and employees. These results provide significant evidence that avoiding abusive supervision is important in controlling employees' ISP noncompliance behavior.Originality/valueThis research fills an important gap in examining employees' ISP noncompliance intentions from the perspective of abusive supervision and the impact of affective, normative and continuance commitment on ISP noncompliance. The study is also of great value for information systems research to examine the moderating role of perceived certainty and severity of sanctions.

When victims become culprits: The role of subordinates’ neuroticism in the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 225-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Raymund James M. Garcia ◽  
Lu Wang ◽  
Vinh Lu ◽  
Kohyar Kiazad ◽  
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog
Keyword(s):  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
Workplace Deviance ◽  
The Relationship

scholarly journals The relationship between abusive supervision and organizational trust: The role of subordinates’ self-esteem

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-197
Author(s):  
Maria João Velez
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Mediation Analysis ◽  
Organizational Trust ◽  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Organizational Settings ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Role Behaviors

Interest in abusive supervision (Tepper, 2000) has increased due to its serious personal andorganizational costs. As such, there is a need for additional studies that identify the individuals’ factorsthat can minimize the adverse effects of abusive supervision.Specifically, we predict employee self-esteem as a buffer of the relationship between abusivesupervision, organizational trust and in-role behaviors. Additionally, we suggest organizational trustas a possible mechanism linking abusive supervision to in-role behaviors. Our model was exploredamong a sample of 201 supervisor-subordinate dyads from different organizational settings. The resultsof the moderated mediation analysis supported our hypotheses. That is, abusive supervision wassignificantly related to in-role behaviors via organizational trust when employees’ self-esteem waslow, but not when it was high. These findings suggest that self-esteem buffers the impact of abusivesupervision perceptions on organizational trust, with consequences for performance.

Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: the role of negative reciprocity

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guglielmo Faldetta
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Organizational Behavior ◽  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
Workplace Deviance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Deviant Behaviors ◽  
Negative Reciprocity ◽  
First Time ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose This study aims to explore the process that, from abusive supervision, leads to the different kinds of workplace deviant behaviors, using the norm of negative reciprocity as the main mechanism that can trigger this process. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on a literature review from organizational behavior and reciprocity fields and builds a theoretical model on the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance within organizations. Findings This study develops a theoretical model where abusive supervision causes a feeling of injustice, which can motivate employees to seek revenge in the form of workplace deviant behaviors. Moreover, negative direct balanced reciprocity will moderate the relationship between the desire for revenge and minor interpersonal workplace deviance; negative direct non-balanced reciprocity will moderate the relationship between the desire for revenge and severe interpersonal workplace deviance; negative generalized balanced reciprocity will moderate the relationship between the desire for revenge and minor organizational workplace deviance; negative generalized non-balanced reciprocity will moderate the relationship between the desire for revenge and severe organizational workplace deviance. Originality/value Previous studies have used negative reciprocity as a moderator, but for the first time, it is split in direct and generalized and in balanced and non-balanced. In particular, when direct negative reciprocity is present, the revenge will take the form of interpersonal workplace deviance; when generalized negative reciprocity is present, the revenge will take the form of organizational workplace deviance. On the other side, when balanced reciprocity is present, revenge will take the form of minor workplace deviance, while when non-balanced reciprocity is present, revenge will take the form of severe workplace deviance.

Why do employees struggle to thrive in the workplaces? A look at the impact of abusive supervision

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammd Usman ◽  
Yuxin Liu ◽  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
Usman Ghani ◽  
Habib Gul
Keyword(s):  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Work Behaviors ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
Core Self ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

PurposeBased on the conservation of resources view, the objective of this paper is to examine the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace thriving. Further, this study investigates the underlying mechanisms role of agentic work behaviors (i.e. task focus, heedful relating) and moderating role of employee's core self-evaluations.Design/methodology/approachUsing a time-lag approach, data are collected from 360 full-time employees enrolled in an executive development program in a large university of China. To test the proposed model, data analysis is carried out through Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS).FindingsThe results show that abusive supervision negatively influences workplace thriving. Further, the findings also confirm the mediating role of agentic work behaviors and the moderating role of core self-evaluations between the relationship of abusive supervision and thriving.Practical implicationsBased on study findings, this study draws the attention of managers toward the new deleterious outcomes of abusive supervision. Hence, to nurture a thriving workforce, organizations should keep abusive behaviors under keen observations to minimize their frequent occurrences. Further, it is proposed that hiring employees with higher core self-evaluations can mitigate the injurious effect of abusive supervision.Originality/valueThis is the first attempt to our knowledge to untapped the abusive supervision-thriving relationship via the underlying mechanisms of two agentic work behavior's and core self-evaluations as a moderator enriches the extant body of knowledge and provide valuable insight into the abusive supervision and workplace thriving literature.

scholarly journals An Eye for an Eye? Third Parties’ Silence Reactions to Peer Abusive Supervision: The Mediating Role of Workplace Anxiety, and the Moderating Role of Core Self-Evaluation

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (24) ◽  
pp. 5027
Author(s):  
Jun Huang ◽  
Gengxuan Guo ◽  
Dingping Tang ◽  
Tianyuan Liu ◽  
Liang Tan
Keyword(s):  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
Spillover Effects ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Mediating Effect ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Core Self ◽  
The Relationship

Currently, a few scholars have studied the spillover effects of abusive supervision from third parties’ perspective. However, these limited researches mainly focus on third parties’ explicit behavior response to peer abusive supervision, ignoring their implicit reactions (e.g., silence) and the emotional mechanism among it. To fill the above gaps, drawing on affective events theory, we construct a theoretical model that explains the relationship among peer abusive supervision, third parties’ workplace anxiety, third parties’ silence, and third parties’ core self-evaluation. Multi-wave data from 283 front-line employees (57% male and 43% female; 57.2% are 30 years old and below, 31.1% are 31–40 years old and 11.7% are over 40 years old), who come from eight real estate and insurance companies in China, were used to support our framework. In particular, our empirical results indicated that peer abusive supervision was positively related to third parties’ silence, among which workplace anxiety played a partial mediating role. In addition, third parties’ core self-evaluation moderated the relationship between peer abusive supervision and silence, meanwhile, the mediating role of workplace anxiety. Specifically, the effect of peer abusive supervision on workplace anxiety, and the mediating effect of workplace anxiety, was weaker when the third parties’ core self-evaluation was higher rather than lower. The results contribute to both theory and practice.

scholarly journals Abusive Supervision and Creativity: Investigating the Moderating Role of Performance Improvement Attribution and the Mediating Role of Psychological Availability

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Can Wang ◽  
Yongchang Wei ◽  
Xuan Zhao ◽  
Xuan Zhang ◽  
Ye Peng
Keyword(s):  
Performance Improvement ◽  
Detrimental Effect ◽  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
Employee Creativity ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Resource Perspective ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role ◽  
Specific Impact

The existing studies have indicated that abusive supervision affects creativity; however, the specific impact mechanism is still unclear due to the uncertain relationship between leadership and employee creativity. Based on the resource perspective, this study examines the influence of abusive supervision on creativity through psychological availability (PA) and the moderating of this mediation by performance improvement attribution (PIA). Based on a survey of 234 employees', the hypotheses have been tested and the results reveal that abusive supervision had a detrimental effect on employee creativity partially mediated by employee PA, and employees' PIA moderated the mediation. This study offers new insights into the mechanisms associated with the relationship between abusive supervision and creativity.

scholarly journals When Does Abusive Supervision Foster Ineffectual and Defensive Silence? Employee Self-Efficacy and Fear as Contingencies

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov ◽  
Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov ◽  
Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev ◽  
Wei Sun
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

This study investigates the relationships between abusive supervision and two forms of silence, ineffectual and defensive; the moderating role of self-efficacy in the association between abusive supervision and ineffectual silence and the contingency role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence. We collected data from 685 employees in manufacturing companies. Of these, 271 were incomplete questionnaires and were excluded from the study; the remaining 414 responses were assessed in the analyses. The results indicate that abusive supervision fosters ineffectual and defensive silence. Moreover, the results suggest that even if supervisors are abusive, individuals with a higher level of self-efficacy tend to have a lower level of ineffectual silence. Furthermore, fear strengthens the link between abusive supervision and defensive silence. According to our knowledge, this work is the first to investigate the relationship between abusive supervision and ineffectual silence, the contingency role of self-efficacy in the link between abusive supervision and ineffectual silence and the moderating role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document