scholarly journals Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 569-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedek Kurdi ◽  
Allison E. Seitchik ◽  
Jordan R. Axt ◽  
Timothy J. Carroll ◽  
Arpi Karapetyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Implicit Association ◽  
Intergroup Behavior

Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.

2009 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony G. Greenwald ◽  
T. Andrew Poehlman ◽  
Eric Luis Uhlmann ◽  
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Implicit Association

scholarly journals Cognitive Control and the Implicit Association Test: A Replication of Siegel, Dougherty, and Huber (2012)

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Johnson ◽  
David Ampofo ◽  
Serra A Erbas ◽  
Alison Robey ◽  
Harry Calvert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Experimental Social Psychology ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Original Study ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Implicit Association ◽  
False Feedback ◽  
Control Versus

The implicit association test (IAT) is widely used to measure evaluative associations towards groups or the self but is influenced by other traits. Siegel, Dougherty, and Huber (2012, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology) found that manipulating cognitive control via false feedback (Study 3) changed the degree to which the IAT was related to cognitive control versus evaluative associations. We conducted two replications of this study and a mini meta-analysis. Null-hypothesis tests, meta-analysis, and a small telescope approach demonstrated weak to no support for the original hypotheses. We conclude that the original findings are unreliable and that both the original study and our replications do not provide evidence that manipulating cognitive control affects IAT scores.

scholarly journals Meta-Analytic Use of Balanced Identity Theory to Validate the Implicit Association Test

2020 ◽  
pp. 014616722091663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Cvencek ◽  
Andrew N. Meltzoff ◽  
Craig D. Maddox ◽  
Brian A. Nosek ◽  
Laurie A. Rudman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Identity Theory ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Implicit Association ◽  
Individual Subject ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Total N

This meta-analysis evaluated theoretical predictions from balanced identity theory (BIT) and evaluated the validity of zero points of Implicit Association Test (IAT) and self-report measures used to test these predictions. Twenty-one researchers contributed individual subject data from 36 experiments (total N = 12,773) that used both explicit and implicit measures of the social–cognitive constructs. The meta-analysis confirmed predictions of BIT’s balance–congruity principle and simultaneously validated interpretation of the IAT’s zero point as indicating absence of preference between two attitude objects. Statistical power afforded by the sample size enabled the first confirmations of balance–congruity predictions with self-report measures. Beyond these empirical results, the meta-analysis introduced a within-study statistical test of the balance–congruity principle, finding that it had greater efficiency than the previous best method. The meta-analysis’s full data set has been publicly archived to enable further studies of interrelations among attitudes, stereotypes, and identities.

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1369-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Hofmann ◽  
Bertram Gawronski ◽  
Tobias Gschwendner ◽  
Huy Le ◽  
Manfred Schmitt
Keyword(s):  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Implicit Association

scholarly journals Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and explicit measures of intergroup cognition: Data from the meta-analysis by Kurdi et al. (2018)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedek Kurdi ◽  
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Present Report ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Implicit Association ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity ◽  
Implicit And Explicit ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Explicit Measures

In the present report we provide a brief summary of the relationship between implicit and explicit measures of social cognition based on the meta-analytic database analyzed in more detail with respect to the relationship between measures of social cognition and measures of intergroup behavior by Kurdi et al. (2018). In the present analysis, a statistically significant but small relationship emerged between implicit and parallel explicit measures of attitudes, stereotypes, and identity. The implicit–explicit relationship was characterized by high levels of statistical heterogeneity, thus making moderator analyses necessary. Implicit and explicit measures were more highly correlated with each other in studies (a) of sexual orientation (relative to other target group categories), (b) using the improved scoring algorithm to index IAT performance, (c) conducted using real-world or online samples (relative to general, student, and preselected samples), (d) conducted using foreign samples (relative to U.S. samples), and (e) conducted by authors with higher levels of experience involving the Implicit Association Test. Other variables that, based on theoretical or practical considerations, may have been expected to produce an effect had no impact.

Men Are Hierarchical, Women Are Egalitarian: An Implicit Gender Stereotype

2004 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Schmid Mast
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Gender Stereotype ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Implicit Association ◽  
Two Samples

The goal of the present study was to provide empirical evidence for the existence of an implicit hierarchy gender stereotype indicating that men are more readily associated with hierarchies and women are more readily associated with egalitarian structures. To measure the implicit hierarchy gender stereotype, the Implicit Association Test (IAT, Greenwald et al., 1998) was used. Two samples of undergraduates (Sample 1: 41 females, 22 males; Sample 2: 35 females, 37 males) completed a newly developed paper-based hierarchy-gender IAT. Results showed that there was an implicit hierarchy gender stereotype: the association between male and hierarchical and between female and egalitarian was stronger than the association between female and hierarchical and between male and egalitarian. Additionally, men had a more pronounced implicit hierarchy gender stereotype than women.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document