The moderating roles of relational interdependence and gender on the association between attachment insecurity and relational aggression in Guam.

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique S. Nakamura ◽  
Yoshito Kawabata
Keyword(s):  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Attachment Insecurity ◽  
And Gender

The Role of Technologies, Behaviors, Gender, and Gender Stereotype Traits in Adolescents’ Cyber Aggression

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1719-1738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle F. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Social Networking ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Mobile Phones ◽  
Social Networking Sites ◽  
Eighth Graders ◽  
Gender Stereotype ◽  
Verbal Aggression ◽  
Cyber Aggression ◽  
And Gender ◽  
The Impact

The present study focused on the impact of gender and gender stereotype traits (i.e., masculinity, femininity) on cyber aggression perpetration utilizing different technologies (i.e., social-networking sites, gaming consoles, mobile phones) and behaviors (i.e., cyber relational aggression, cyber verbal aggression, hacking). Participants included 233 eighth graders (108 female; Mage = 13.26, SD = 0.36) from two middle schools in the Midwestern United States. Adolescents completed questionnaires on their endorsement of masculinity and femininity traits as well as how often they engaged in cyber aggression perpetration (i.e., cyber relational aggression, cyber verbal aggression, hacking) through mobile phones, social-networking sites, and gaming consoles. Findings indicated that boys and girls with more feminine traits engaged in more cyber relational aggression through social-networking sites and mobile phones, while boys and girls who endorsed more masculine traits perpetrated this behavior and cyber verbal aggression more often through online gaming. In addition, these boys and girls engaged in more hacking through all technologies when compared with girls and boys who reported more feminine traits. Results of this study indicate the importance of delineating gender stereotype traits, behaviors, and technologies when examining cyber aggression perpetration.

Adolescents’ Perceptions of Male Involvement in Relational Aggression: Age and Gender Differences

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curt Johnson ◽  
Melissa Allen Heath ◽  
Benjamin M. Bailey ◽  
Sarah M. Coyne ◽  
Niwako Yamawaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Male Involvement ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Age And Gender Differences ◽  
And Gender

Gender Discrepancies and Victimization of Students With Disabilities

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 296-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia G. Simpson ◽  
Chad A. Rose ◽  
Stephanie K. Ellis
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
School Level ◽  
Online Victimization ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Perpetrators And Victims ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Gender Discrepancies

Students with disabilities have been recognized as disproportionately involved within the bullying dynamic. However, few studies have examined the interaction between disability status, gender, and grade level. The current study explored the gender discrepancies among students with and without disabilities in middle and high school on bullying, fighting, relational aggression perpetration, victimization, online victimization, and relational aggression victimizations. Results suggest that students with disabilities are more likely to be involved as victims and perpetrators. In addition, males are more likely to be perpetrators and victims, whereas females are more likely to experience online victimization and relational victimization. Furthermore, students in high school are more likely to report bullying, whereas students in middle school are more likely to report fighting. Interactions between school level, disability status, and gender were significant for victimization and perpetration.

scholarly journals Neuroendocrine regulation and physical and relational aggression: The moderating roles of child maltreatment and gender.

2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 1160-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianna Murray-Close ◽  
Georges Han ◽  
Dante Cicchetti ◽  
Nicki R. Crick ◽  
Fred A. Rogosch
Keyword(s):  
Child Maltreatment ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Neuroendocrine Regulation ◽  
And Gender

scholarly journals Adolescents’ Cyber Victimization: The Influence of Technologies, Gender, and Gender Stereotype Traits

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1293
Author(s):  
Michelle F. Wright ◽  
Sebastian Wachs
Keyword(s):  
Social Networking ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Mobile Phones ◽  
Social Networking Sites ◽  
The United States ◽  
Gender Stereotype ◽  
Relational Victimization ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cyber Victimization ◽  
And Gender

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of gender and gender stereotype traits (masculinity, femininity) in cyber victimization behaviors (cyber relational victimization, cyber verbal victimization, hacking) through different technologies (mobile phones, gaming consoles, social networking sites). There were 456 8th graders (226 females; M age = 13.66, SD = 0.41) from two midwestern middle schools in the United States included in this study. They completed questionnaires on their endorsement of masculine and feminine traits, and self-reported cyber victimization through different technologies. The findings revealed main effects of types of cyber victimization for boys and of technology for girls. In particular, boys with feminine traits experienced the most victimization by cyber verbal aggression, cyber relational aggression, and hacking when compared to the other groups of boys. Girls with feminine traits experienced the most cyber victimization through social networking sites, gaming consoles, and mobile phones in comparison to the other groups of girls. For girls with feminine traits, they reported more cyber relational victimization and cyber verbal victimization through mobile phones and social networking sites, as well as more hacking via social networking sites. Such findings underscore the importance of considering gender stereotype traits, types of victimization, and technologies when examining cyber victimization.

Physiological stress reactivity and physical and relational aggression: The moderating roles of victimization, type of stressor, and child gender

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianna Murray-Close ◽  
Nicki R. Crick ◽  
Wan-Ling Tseng ◽  
Nicole Lafko ◽  
Casey Burrows ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Stress Reactivity ◽  
Physiological Stress ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Relational Victimization ◽  
Physiological Reactivity ◽  
Child Gender ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Laboratory Stress

AbstractThe purpose of the present investigation was to examine the association between physiological reactivity to peer stressors and physical and relational aggression. Potential moderation by actual experiences of peer maltreatment (i.e., physical and relational victimization) and gender were also explored. One hundred ninety-six children (M = 10.11 years, SD = 0.64) participated in a laboratory stress protocol during which their systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and skin conductance reactivity to recounting a relational stressor (e.g., threats to relationships) and an instrumental stressor (e.g., threats to physical well-being, dominance, or property) were assessed. Teachers provided reports of aggression and victimization. In both boys and girls, physical aggression was associated with blunted physiological reactivity to relational stress and heightened physiological reactivity to instrumental stress, particularly among youth higher in victimization. In girls, relational aggression was most robustly associated with blunted physiological reactivity to relational stressors, particularly among girls exhibiting higher levels of relational victimization. In boys, relational aggression was associated with heightened physiological reactivity to both types of stressors at higher levels of peer victimization and blunted physiological reactivity to both types of stressors at lower levels of victimization. Results underscore the shared and distinct emotional processes underlying physical and relational aggression in boys and girls.

Heightened emotional sensitivity intensifies associations between relational aggression and victimization among girls but not boys: A longitudinal study

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck ◽  
Amanda L. Duffy
Keyword(s):  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Rejection Sensitivity ◽  
Early Adolescents ◽  
Relational Victimization ◽  
Negative Evaluation ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Emotional Sensitivity ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
And Gender

AbstractFounded in the social process model, the aim of this study was to identify whether the associations of relational aggression with concurrent and subsequent relational victimization differed depending on early adolescents' personal vulnerabilities and gender. The vulnerabilities of interest were social-information processing variables that convey greater emotional sensitivity, including rejection sensitivity, fear of negative evaluation, and avoidance of intimacy. Participants were 358 early adolescents (176 boys, 178 girls) aged 9 to 13 years. Relational aggression and victimization were assessed via peer nominations, whereas the three indicators of emotional sensitivity were assessed via self-report. Overall, results revealed greater relational aggression at Time 1 to be associated with greater relational victimization at both Time 1 and Time 2. However, this finding was qualified by both emotional sensitivity and gender. When considered separately, girls who were relationally aggressive and emotionally sensitive were at increased risk of victimization at both assessment points. In contrast, no link was found between relational aggression and victimization for boys, although relational vulnerabilities did have unique associations with boys' relational victimization. These findings have implications for our understanding of relational aggression and victimization, as well as for the development of interventions aimed at reducing these problems.

Relational Aggression and Gender: An Overview

2012 ◽  
pp. 245-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicki R. Crick ◽  
Jamie M. Ostrov ◽  
Yoshito Kawabata
Keyword(s):  
Relational Aggression ◽  
And Gender
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document