The influence of verbal and spatial working memory load on the time course of the Simon effect.

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 342-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Clouter ◽  
Ryan Wilson ◽  
Stefan Allen ◽  
Raymond M. Klein ◽  
Gail A. Eskes
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya Gao ◽  
Jan Theeuwes

AbstractWhere and what we attend to is not only determined by our current goals but also by what we have encountered in the past. Recent studies have shown that people learn to extract statistical regularities in the environment resulting in attentional suppression of high-probability distractor locations, effectively reducing capture by a distractor. Here, we asked whether this statistical learning is dependent on working memory resources. The additional singleton task in which one location was more likely to contain a distractor was combined with a concurrent visual working memory task (Experiment 1) and a spatial working memory task (Experiment 2). The result showed that learning to suppress this high-probability location was not at all affected by working memory load. We conclude that learning to suppress a location is an implicit and automatic process that does not rely on visual or spatial working memory capacity, nor on executive control resources. We speculate that extracting regularities from the environment likely relies on long-term memory processes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 104656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie V. Koebele ◽  
Kenji J. Nishimura ◽  
Heather A. Bimonte-Nelson ◽  
Salma Kemmou ◽  
J. Bryce Ortiz ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie J. Nagel ◽  
Arthur Ohannessian ◽  
Kevin Cummins

Past research has inconsistently distinguished the neural substrates of various types of working memory. Task design and individual performance differences are known to alter patterns of brain response during working-memory tasks. These task and individual differences may have produced discrepancies in imaging findings. This study of 50 healthy adults ( Mage = 19.6 yr., SD = .8) examined performance during various parametric manipulations of a verbal and spatial n-back working-memory task. Performance systematically dissociated on the basis of working-memory load, working memory type, and stimulus difficulty, with participants having greater accuracy but slower response time during conditions requiring verbal versus spatial working memory. These findings hold implications for cognitive and neuroimaging studies of verbal and spatial working memory and highlight the importance of considering both task design and individual behavior.


NeuroImage ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. S420 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Glahn ◽  
Theo Van Erp ◽  
Nicole Hill ◽  
John Haselgrove ◽  
Tyrone Cannon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document