A characterization of individual differences in prospective memory monitoring using the Complex Ongoing Serial Task.

2012 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Savine ◽  
Mark A. McDaniel ◽  
Jill Talley Shelton ◽  
Michael K. Scullin
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Prospective Memory ◽  
Serial Task ◽  
Memory Monitoring

A model-based characterization of individual differences in prospective memory monitoring

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Savine ◽  
Jill T. Shelton ◽  
Michael K. Scullin ◽  
Mark A. McDaniel
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Prospective Memory ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Memory Monitoring

Efficient characterization of individual differences in compression ratio preference

2018 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. 2662-2673
Author(s):  
Lucas S Baltzell ◽  
Jing Xia ◽  
Sridhar Kalluri
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Compression Ratio

scholarly journals Individual Differences in Prospective Memory Offloading in Laboratory and Naturalistic Settings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hunter Ball ◽  
Philip Peper ◽  
Durna Alakbarova ◽  
Sam Gilbert ◽  
Gene Arnold Brewer
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Prospective Memory ◽  
High Ability ◽  
Memory Ability ◽  
Multiple Measures ◽  
Good Working

The current study examined whether offloading prospective memory (PM) demands onto the environment through the use of reminders eliminates PM differences typically seen between individuals that have poor or good working memory ability. Over two laboratory sessions scheduled one week apart, participants completed three versions of a PM offloading task with and without the use of reminders, along with multiple measures of working memory. Participants also generated a list of naturalistic intentions to fulfill between sessions and were given an intention to email the experimenter every day. They later indicated which intentions were completed with and without the use of reminders. Consistent with prior research, high working memory participants did better in both laboratory and naturalistic settings when having to rely on their own memory. Critically, however, working memory ability was no longer predictive of performance with the use of reminders. Participants with lower working memory also offloaded more often that high ability participants, but this was not optimally calibrated to actual PM performance. These findings suggest that offloading may be particularly beneficial for those with poor cognitive ability. The theoretical and applied ramifications of these findings are discussed.

scholarly journals Prospective Memory, Personality, and Individual Differences

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Uttl ◽  
Carmela A. White ◽  
Daniela Wong Gonzalez ◽  
Joanna McDouall ◽  
Carrie A. Leonard
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Prospective Memory

scholarly journals Age and individual differences in prospective memory during a "Virtual Week": The roles of working memory, vigilance, task regularity, and cue focality.

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan S. Rose ◽  
Peter G. Rendell ◽  
Mark A. McDaniel ◽  
Ingo Aberle ◽  
Matthias Kliegel
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Prospective Memory ◽  
Vigilance Task ◽  
Cue Focality

Prospective Memory Failures in Aviation: Effects of Cue Salience, Workload, and Individual Differences

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen D. Van Benthem ◽  
Chris M. Herdman ◽  
Rani G. Tolton ◽  
Jo-Anne LeFevre
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Prospective Memory ◽  
Cue Salience

scholarly journals Individual differences in the neuropsychopathology of addiction

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-229 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Substance Use Disorder ◽  
Negative Reinforcement ◽  
Incentive Salience ◽  
Cognitive Profiles ◽  
Pharmacological Treatments ◽  
Brain Reward ◽  
The Brain

Drug addiction or substance-use disorder is a chronically relapsing disorder that progresses through binge/intoxication, withdrawal/negative affect and preoccupation/anticipation stages. These stages represent diverse neurobiological mechanisms that are differentially involved in the transition from recreational to compulsive drug use and from positive to negative reinforcement. The progression from recreational to compulsive substance use is associated with downregulation of the brain reward systems and upregulation of the brain stress systems. Individual differences in the neurobiological systems that underlie the processing of reward, incentive salience, habits, stress, pain, and executive function may explain (i) the vulnerability to substance-use disorder; (ii) the diversity of emotional, motivational, and cognitive profiles of individuals with substance-use disorders; and (iii) heterogeneous responses to cognitive and pharmacological treatments. Characterization of the neuropsychological mechanisms that underlie individual differences in addiction-like behaviors is the key to understanding the mechanisms of addiction and development of personalized pharmacotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document