Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 1068-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Timothy Church ◽  
Juan M. Alvarez ◽  
Nhu T. Q. Mai ◽  
Brian F. French ◽  
Marcia S. Katigbak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Cultural Comparisons

Revised Neo Personality Inventory Profiles of Narcissistic and Nonnarcissistic People

1994 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 512-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerella V. Ramanaiah ◽  
Fred R. J. Detwiler ◽  
Anupama Byravan
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Narcissistic Personality ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Narcissistic Personality Inventory ◽  
Univariate Analyses

This study investigated the construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory against the Revised NEO Personality Inventory to test the hypothesis that narcissistic and nonnarcissistic people have different personality profiles The two inventories were administered to 96 male and 92 female undergraduates Multivariate as well as univariate analyses of variance indicated that the Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles were significantly different for narcissistic and nonnarcissistic groups which supported the construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.

Spiritual Well-Being and Personality

2001 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerella V. Ramanaiah ◽  
Jennifer K. Rielage ◽  
J. Patrick Sharpe
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Multivariate Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Spiritual Well Being ◽  
Univariate Analyses

The hypothesis that High and Low Spiritual Well-being groups have different personality profiles was tested with 319 psychology undergraduates (132 men and 187 women) who completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and the Spiritual Well-being Scale for partial course credit. Univariate analyses of variance indicated that the High Spiritual Well-being group scored lower on Neuroticism and higher or Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness than the Low Spiritual Well-being group. Multivariate analysis of variance indicated that the two groups had significantly different personality profiles, supporting the hypothesis.

Weinberger Adjustment Typology and the Five Factor Model of Personality

1996 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 432-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerella V. Ramanaiah ◽  
Anupama Byravan ◽  
Nguyen ThuHien
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Personality Types ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory

Construct validity of Weinberger's Six-group Typology of Adjustment was investigated by testing the hypothesis that the six personality types have different personality profiles. The Weinberger Adjustment Inventory and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory were completed by 170 psychology undergraduates (84 men and 86 women). Results strongly supported the tested hypothesis.

Type a Behavior and the Five-Factor Model of Personality

1997 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 368-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerella V. Ramanaiah ◽  
John P. Sharpe ◽  
Anupama Byravan
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Function ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Type A ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Factors ◽  
Type B ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory

The hypothesis that people classified as Type A and Type B have different personality profiles based on five major personality factors (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness) was tested using the Student Jenkins Activity Survey and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Results based on discriminant function analysis of data from 243 psychology undergraduates (105 males and 138 females) strongly supported the hypothesis indicating that Type A and Type B groups have significantly different Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles and that the standardized discriminant function coefficients were large for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness and moderately large for Extraversion.

scholarly journals How Accurate Are National Stereotypes? A Test of Different Methodological Approaches

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Hřebíčková ◽  
René Mõttus ◽  
Sylvie Graf ◽  
Martin Jelínek ◽  
Anu Realo
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Personality Psychology ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Real People ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
National Stereotypes

We compared different methodological approaches in research on the accuracy of national stereotypes that use aggregated mean scores of real people's personality traits as criteria for stereotype accuracy. Our sample comprised 16,713 participants from the Central Europe and 1,090 participants from the Baltic Sea region. Participants rated national stereotypes of their own country using the National Character Survey (NCS) and their personality traits using either the Revised NEO Personality Inventory or the NCS. We examined the effects of different (i) methods for rating of real people (Revised NEO Personality Inventory vs. NCS) and national stereotypes (NCS); (ii) norms for converting raw scores into T–scores (Russian vs. international norms); and (iii) correlation techniques (intraclass correlations vs. Pearson correlations vs. rank–order correlations) on the resulting agreement between the ratings of national stereotypes and real people. We showed that the accuracy of national stereotypes depended on the employed methodology. The accuracy was the highest when ratings of real people and national stereotypes were made using the same method and when rank order correlations were used to estimate the agreement between national stereotypes and personality profiles of real people. We propose a new statistical procedure for determining national stereotype accuracy that overcomes limitations of past studies. We provide methodological recommendations applicable to a wider range of cross national stereotype accuracy studies. Copyright © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology

Effects of self‐enhancement on agreement on personality profiles

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Borkenau ◽  
Katrin Zaltauskas
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Profile ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Rater Agreement ◽  
Socially Desirable Responding ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Data Analyses ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Average Profile

Effects of self‐enhancement and socially desirable responding (SDR) on rater agreement for personality profiles were studied in 304 students. Dyads of participants described themselves and their peer on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) that measures 30 facets of personality. In addition, participants filled in six scales measuring self‐enhancement or SDR. Data analyses focussed on moderator and suppressor effects of SDR on the similarity between self‐reported and other reported NEO‐PI‐R profiles. Three kinds of profile agreement were distinguished: (a) normative agreement; (b) distinctive agreement and (c) profile normativeness, that is, how strongly a self‐reported personality profile resembled the average profile of all participants. There were no moderator or suppressor effects on distinctive agreement, but SDR predicted profile normativeness quite strongly. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

scholarly journals Low Openness on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory as a Risk Factor for Treatment-Resistant Depression

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e71964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michio Takahashi ◽  
Yukihiko Shirayama ◽  
Katsumasa Muneoka ◽  
Masatoshi Suzuki ◽  
Koichi Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Resistant Depression
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document