Structural validity of Turkish versions of the Gender Role Conflict Scale and Male Role Norms Scale.

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne H. Lease ◽  
Ayşe Çiftçi ◽  
Ayhan Demir ◽  
Güler Boyraz
Keyword(s):  
Gender Role ◽  
Role Conflict ◽  
Gender Role Conflict ◽  
Structural Validity ◽  
Male Role ◽  
Male Role Norms ◽  
Role Norms ◽  
Conflict Scale

Structural Validity of the Gender Role Conflict Scale--Turkish Version

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne H. Lease ◽  
Ayse Uruk ◽  
Guler Boyraz ◽  
Brett A. Stancil ◽  
Elin Overbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gender Role ◽  
Role Conflict ◽  
Gender Role Conflict ◽  
Turkish Version ◽  
Structural Validity ◽  
Conflict Scale

Gender Role Conflict Scale for Adolescents

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Blazina ◽  
Maribel A. Cordova ◽  
Stewart Pisecco ◽  
Anna G. Settle
Keyword(s):  
Gender Role ◽  
Role Conflict ◽  
Gender Role Conflict ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Male Role ◽  
Masculinity Ideology ◽  
Conflict Scale

This study investigated the Gender Role Conflict Scale-Adolescent Version (GRCS-A) and its relationship with the Gender Role Conflict Scale (GRCS), the measure from which it was adapted. Significant correlations between the adult and adolescent versions provided support for the concurrent validity of the GRCS-A. Further analyses revealed that two other measures of male masculinity, the Adolescent Masculinity Ideology in Relationships Scale (AMIRS) and Male Role Attitudes Scale (MRAS), are also significantly related to the GRCS-A. Implications for future research and clinical use are discussed.

"Emo" Culture and Gender Norms in Late Adolescents and Young Adults

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah N. Allooh ◽  
Christina M. Rummell ◽  
Ronald F. Levant
Keyword(s):  
Gender Role ◽  
Role Conflict ◽  
Gender Role Conflict ◽  
Late Adolescents ◽  
Negatively Associated ◽  
Restrictive Emotionality ◽  
Male Role Norms ◽  
And Gender ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Role Norms

The present study examined the extent to which youth who endorse emo subculture reject the traditional masculine norm of restrictive emotionality. It also examined the relationships between endorsement and rejection of emo subculture and traditional masculine and feminine norms and masculine gender role conflict. In Study 1 (N = 13) three focus groups were conducted to create the mixed methods Emo Culture Questionnaire (ECQ). In Study 2 (N = 164) exploratory factor analysis of the quantitative part of the ECQ resulted in a 15-item, 4-factor scale; however, due to low reliabilities, only two scales were used in the analyses. Three hypotheses were mostly supported. The endorsement of emo subculture by men was negatively associated with their Restrictive Emotionality subscale scores of both the Male Role Norms Inventory-Revised (MRNI-R) and Gender Role Conflict Scale (GRCS). The endorsement of emo subculture by women was negatively associated with their MRNI-R Restrictive Emotionality scores but was not positively associated their Femininity Ideology Scale (FIS) Emotionality scores. Negative views of the emo subculture by both men and women were positively correlated with their MRNI-R Restrictive Emotionality scores. An exploratory question found that the endorsement of emo subculture had significant negative correlations with three additional MRNI-R subscales and the total scale for men and with five MRNI-R subscales and the total scale for women. In addition, the endorsement of emo subculture had significant negative correlations with two FIS subscales, and with two additional GRCS subscales and the total scale for men. Qualitative results from the ECQ indicated that while the label “emo” may not function as a personal identifier, the music, fashion, and behavior thus identified remain popular.

Revisiting the structural validity of the Gender Role Conflict Scale.

2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie Moradi ◽  
David M. Tokar ◽  
Michael Schaub ◽  
LaRae M. Jome ◽  
George S. Serna
Keyword(s):  
Gender Role ◽  
Role Conflict ◽  
Gender Role Conflict ◽  
Structural Validity ◽  
Conflict Scale

Factor Structure of the Gender Role Conflict Scale

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale R. Fuqua ◽  
Kevin R. Herdman ◽  
Namok B. Choi ◽  
Jody L. Newman
Keyword(s):  
Gender Role ◽  
Role Conflict ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Gender Role Conflict ◽  
Conflict Scale

Gender Role Conflict Scale: Validation for a Sample of Gay Men and Lesbian Women

2012 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Herdman ◽  
Dale R. Fuqua ◽  
Namok Choi ◽  
Jody L. Newman
Keyword(s):  
Gender Role ◽  
Gay Men ◽  
Role Conflict ◽  
Gender Role Conflict ◽  
Scale Validation ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lesbian Women ◽  
Expressive Dimension ◽  
Conflict Scale

This study tested the oblique four-factor model of the Gender Role Conflict Scale for a sample of gay men and lesbian women residing in the United States. 400 gay men and 292 lesbian women recruited from university and college gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender LISTSERVs participated. The internal consistency reliability of the Gender Role Conflict Scale scores was high, but low means on the expressive dimension of gender role conflict were noted. The results of two separate sets of confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the four-factor model's fit to the data could be enhanced for both groups by applying item parceling to lower the number of indicators per factor, suggesting that the actual structural validity of the Gender Role Conflict Scale may be better than suggested by the reported fit indices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document