Mental Illness and Intellectual DisabilityMental Illness and Intellectual Disability

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 5353 (2222) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald P. Oswald
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Intellectual Disability

Idiocy and the Conceptual Economy of Madness

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray K. Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Seventeenth Century ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Binary Separation ◽  
Conceptual Structures ◽  
Binary Relationship ◽  
Separate Branch ◽  
William Cullen

The binary relationship between ‘intellectual disability’ and ‘mental illness’ is widely regarded as self-evident and long-established. This chapter demonstrates that the historical, and continuing, relationship between intellectual disability and psychiatry is, in fact, ambiguous and inconsistent. Beginning with the nosology of William Cullen in the latter part of the seventeenth century, the chapter explores the dispersal of madness across all the branches of disease and illness. The advent of alienism and Pinel’s nosology of madness, at the beginning of the eighteenth century, produced much flatter conceptual structures, in which idiocy was one of the various forms of madness. As psychiatry developed, the position of idiocy shifted. Maudsley located it in a separate branch, though still not separated in a binary manner from insanity. Lastly, the nosology of the neurologist Spitzka became more nuanced and layered, though still without a binary separation of idiocy. The chapter takes the view that the lack of any consistent underlying paradigm in psychiatry will continue to make the presence and position of intellectual disability impossible to fix. Psychoanalytic and neo-Jasperian psychiatry thoroughly exclude it as an object of investigation.

scholarly journals FUTURE PLANNING AMONG OLDER CAREGIVERS OF FAMILY MEMBERS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY OR MENTAL ILLNESS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S287-S287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Wang ◽  
Yangdi Han
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Family Member ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Institutional Care ◽  
Family Care ◽  
Future Planning ◽  
Ideal Situation ◽  
Older Caregivers ◽  
The Ideal

Abstract Objectives: This study aims to examine future planning among older caregivers for family members with intellectual disability or mental illness, focusing on preferences, predictors and barriers. Method: Data were drawn from 260 caregivers (aged 50 or older) to a family member with intellectual disability or mental illness in Shanghai, China. Caregivers rated six types of future care arrangement under three circumstances: (1) the ideal situation, (2) unable to provide care due to age-related illnesses, and (3) caregivers are deceased. Socio-demographic factors associated with future planning were examined using multinomial logistic regression. Caregivers also rated twelve barriers to future planning. Results: Government-subsidized care facility is the most preferable care arrangement across the three circumstances. While continuing family care was still preferred if caregivers were to become sick or deceased, it was a less preferred option in the ideal situation. Common barriers were the cost of institutional care and the inadequate skills of the staff. Regarding the predictors of future planning, the older the caregivers were, the less likely they had no future plans. Caregivers were more likely to prefer family care over institutional care if their family members had mild impairment. Caregivers of a family member with mental illness were more likely to have no future planning than caregivers of a family member with intellectual disability. Conclusion: This study identified the needs of older caregivers for future planning specific to different circumstances. It also identified demographic profiles of future planning and the caregiver population at risk of no future planning.

The maelstrom of punishment, mental illness, intellectual disability and cognitive impairment

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Segrave ◽  
Claire Spivakovsky ◽  
Anna Eriksson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Intellectual Disability

Mind Matters: a psychoeducation programme for individuals with intellectual disabilities and co-morbid diagnoses of mental disorder

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Ashworth ◽  
Krista Jansen ◽  
Lydia Bullock ◽  
Paul Mooney
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Intellectual Disabilities ◽  
Psychological Intervention ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Group Members

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a feasibility study into the development and pilot of a psychoeducational group for people with intellectual disability and co-morbid mental disorder (including mental illness and personality disorder) within forensic settings. Design/methodology/approach “Mind Matters”, a psychoeducational programme for people with an intellectual disability and co-morbid mental disorders is a group based programme in a medium secure hospital, adapted and developed to be suitable for people with intellectual disability therapist multidisciplinary approach was key to its development. An open group on a 16-bedded ward for individuals with mild to moderate intellectual disability and co-morbid mental illness was delivered over a six-week period. Findings The group was positively received in pilot by participants and members of the clinical teams. Attendance and engagement of participants were key measures of the success of the programme. In addition to the apparent increased social skills and motivation to engage with future psychological intervention. Practical implications The authors believe that this approach benefitted both the group members and staff on ward, reinforcing strategies for maintaining positive mental health. It also stimulated engagement, discussion about mental disorders including mental illness, personality disorder and intellectual disabilities. Originality/value This paper shows how a psychoeducational approach to mental disorder and mental health in individuals with an intellectual disability is possible, beneficial and well received.

scholarly journals A Family Study of Consanguinity in Children with Intellectual Disabilities in Barwani, India

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 551-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram Lakhan ◽  
Rajshekhar Bipeta ◽  
Srinivasa S. R. R. Yerramilli ◽  
Vinayak K. Nahar
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Family Study ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Consanguineous Marriage ◽  
Guidance And Counseling ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Consanguineous Marriages ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Deviant Case

ABSTRACT Background: Intellectual disability (ID) can be inherited in families through consanguineous marriage. The ID in an individual can be associated with the ID, epilepsy, and mental illness in their parents. Such connections can be seen more closely among consanguineous marriages in tribal and nontribal population in India. Objective: This study shows a few common patterns of the consanguineous relationship in the parents of children with ID in India. Materials and Methods: This is a case series research design. Extreme or deviant case sampling was applied. Data were collected in homes, camps, and clinical settings in the Barwani district of Madhya Pradesh, India. The patterns of consanguineous marriages and the relationship between children with ID and their relatives with ID, epilepsy, and mental illness were analyzed and reported with pedigree charts. Results: Multiple patterns of consanguineous marriages in tribal and nontribal populations were observed. ID was found to be associated in children with their relatives of the first, second, and third generations. Conclusion: ID may inherit in individuals from their relatives of the first, second, and third generations who have ID, epilepsy, or mental illness and married in the relationship. Appropriate knowledge, guidance, and counseling may be provided to potential couples before planning a consanguineous marriage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document