Use of self-regulated learning for children with ADHD: Research and practice opportunities.

2015 ◽  
pp. 15-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda A. Reddy ◽  
Erik Newman ◽  
Arielle Verdesco
Keyword(s):  
Use Of Self ◽  
Children With Adhd ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Practice Opportunities

scholarly journals Self-Regulated Learning: the essential factor for understanding and improving academic and clinical performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 36232
Author(s):  
John Sandars
Keyword(s):  
Goal Setting ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Learning Processes ◽  
Use Of Self ◽  
Essential Factor ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
The Social ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Improved Performance

There is increasing interest in the importance of Self-Regulated Learning for the improvement of academic and clinical performance. Self-Regulated Learning is a dynamic and cyclical metacognitive process that coordinates an individual’s skill (techniques) and will (motivation) to achieve a clearly defined task. There are differences in key Self-Regulated Learning processes between high and low performers, especially goal setting and self-monitoring. Formative feedback on the use of key Self-Regulated Learning processes, which can be identified using microanalysis before, during and after an individual performs a specific task, can lead to improved performance. There is increasing awareness of the importance of both the social and educational environment on the use of Self-Regulated Learning, including the essential influence of the teacher. 

scholarly journals The Relationships Between Self-Efficacy, Task Value, and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Massive Open Online Courses

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daeyeoul Lee ◽  
Sunnie Lee Watson ◽  
William R Watson
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Task Value ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Use Of Self ◽  
Massive Open Online ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Regulated Learning

This study examines the relationships between self-efficacy, task value, and the use of self-regulated learning strategies by massive open online course (MOOC) learners from a social cognitive perspective. A total of 184 participants who enrolled in two MOOCs completed surveys. The results of Pearson’s correlation analysis show a positive correlation between self-efficacy and the use of self-regulated learning strategies, as well as a positive correlation between task value and the use of self-regulated learning strategies. The results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis show that self-efficacy and task value are significant predictors of the use of self-regulated learning strategies. There was a statistically significant difference in the use of self-regulated learning strategies between learners who possessed high self-efficacy and those who possessed low self-efficacy. In addition, learners who had high task value showed statistically significant higher average self-regulated learning scores than those who had low task value. Implications and future research directions are discussed based on the findings.

scholarly journals A Qualitative Account of The Nature and Use of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) Strategies Employed by University Students

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 40-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Effat Alvi ◽  
◽  
Zafar Iqbal ◽  
Fatima Masood ◽  
Tooba Batool ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Use Of Self ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning

scholarly journals Exploring the Relationships Between Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies of English Language Learners in a College Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daeyeoul Lee ◽  
Matthew Allen ◽  
Lixia Cheng ◽  
Sunnie Watson ◽  
William Watson
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
English Language Learners ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
English Language ◽  
Use Of Self ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
College Setting

This study investigated the relationships between self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies of English Language Learners (ELL) in a college setting from a social cognitive perspective. Participants in this study were one hundred seventeen ELL college students who enrolled in an English language course at a Midwestern university. The results of simple linear regression analysis showed that ELL college students’ self-efficacy significantly predicted their use of self-regulated learning strategies. In addition, the results of a one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference in the use of self-regulated learning strategies between ELL college students who had high self-efficacy and those who had low self-efficacy. Based on study results, implications and future research directions are discussed.

scholarly journals Turkish adaptation of childrens perceived use of self-regulated learning inventory

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 375-381
Author(s):  
Fatih Doğan Muhammet ◽  
Şahin-Taşkın Çiğdem
Keyword(s):  
Use Of Self ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning

Self-Regulated Learning in Reading: Gifted Pedagogy and Instructional Settings

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Housand ◽  
Sally M. Reis
Keyword(s):  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Gifted Students ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Use Of Self ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
The Individual

Personal processes, the environment, and individual behaviors of both teachers and students are factors that facilitate students' use of self-regulation learning strategies in reading. Some environmental conditions, such as organization of materials and clear expectations, support the development and use of self-regulation learning (SRL) strategies in reading. Teachers who use explicit instruction and modeling of SRL strategies have more students who can use self-regulation to read for longer periods and respond to higher order thinking questions. However, there are highly self-regulated students (even though fewer numbers) in low self-regulation classrooms, suggesting that individual differences in SRL strategies exist among gifted students and perhaps some gifted students as early as fifth grade have already attained the individual ability to use self-regulated learning SRL strategies to read and learn. The combination of domain-specific strategy instruction in reading combined with the use of SRL strategies to support knowledge acquisition seems to help more students in the higher self-regulation classroom achieve and maintain focus during reading instruction.

ADHD and SCT Symptomatology in Relation to College Students’ Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (14) ◽  
pp. 1719-1728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Shelton ◽  
William E. Addison ◽  
Cynthia M. Hartung
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Strategy Use ◽  
Sluggish Cognitive Tempo ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Use Of Self ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulation Strategies

Objective: The present study examined the relation between self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies and ADHD and sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) symptomatology. Method: Participants were 303 college students, aged 18 to 25 ( M = 20.04, SD = 1.45), from a Midwestern university who completed the Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale-IV (BAARS-IV), and a shortened, generalized version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Results: Among college students, inattention symptomatology was consistently predictive of deficits in use of value, expectancy, and self-regulation strategies, while SCT symptomatology was only predictive of deficits in the use of self-regulation strategies. Conclusion: This study is the first to examine the relation between SCT symptomatology and SRL strategy use in college students. The findings revealed that SRL strategy use differs between college students exhibiting ADHD or SCT symptomatology. Remediation focusing on these deficits would likely increase academic achievement. Clinical implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document