Beyond the individual: Group, couple, and family therapy.

2014 ◽  
pp. 447-493
Author(s):  
Charles J. Gelso ◽  
Elizabeth Nutt Williams ◽  
Bruce R. Fretz
Keyword(s):  
Family Therapy ◽  
Individual Group ◽  
Couple And Family Therapy ◽  
The Individual

Optimizing language use in couple and family therapy

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Gale ◽  
Joaquin Gaete Silva ◽  
Ines Sametband ◽  
Jaqueline Amorim Webb
Keyword(s):  
Family Therapy ◽  
Language Use ◽  
Couple And Family Therapy

The importance and difficulties of alliance in couple and family therapy

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Friedlander ◽  
V. Escudero ◽  
L. Heatherington ◽  
G. M. Diamond
Keyword(s):  
Family Therapy ◽  
Couple And Family Therapy

A family with oedipal dynamics

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-118
Author(s):  
Li Yanling ◽  
David E. Scharff
Keyword(s):  
Family Therapy ◽  
Parental Care ◽  
Young Woman ◽  
Discussion Group ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Group Leaders ◽  
Couple And Family Therapy ◽  
Supervision Group ◽  
The Way

The following case presents the way that overtly oedipal identification in a young woman covered failure in early parental care and discontent between her parents. The case was presented by Li Yanling to her supervision group, and the commentary and elaboration have been gathered from comments from the entire group of advanced supervisees, all of whom were discussion group leaders in the Beijing Continuous Program in Psychoanalytic Couple and Family Therapy.

The Concept of the Individual and Its Scope

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula Renz
Keyword(s):  
Strict Sense ◽  
Physical Concept ◽  
Individual Group ◽  
Group Minds ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Individual

This chapter discusses the implications of Spinoza’s concept of individual bodies, as introduced in the definition of individuum in the physical digression. It begins by showing that this definition allows for an extremely wide application of the term; accordingly, very different sorts of physical entities can be described as Spinozistic individuals. Given the quite distinct use of the terms divisibilis and indivisibilis in his metaphysics, however, the chapter argues that the physical concept of individuality is not universally applied in the Ethics but reserved for physical or natural-philosophical considerations. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the problem of collective individuals. It is argued that, while societies or states are described as individual bodies, they do not constitute individual group minds in the strict sense of the term for Spinoza. This in turn indicates that minds are not individuated in the same way as bodies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document