Psychological perspectives on problems with forensic science evidence.

2012 ◽  
pp. 257-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itiel E. Dror ◽  
Rebecca Bucht
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Science ◽  
Science Evidence

Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristy Martire ◽  
Agnes Bali ◽  
Kaye Ballantyne ◽  
Gary Edmond ◽  
Richard Kemp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Science ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Forensic Sciences ◽  
Positive Error ◽  
False Positive Error ◽  
Reliability Estimates ◽  
Positive Report ◽  
Science Evidence ◽  
Science Disciplines

We do not know how often false positive reports are made in a range of forensic science disciplines. In the absence of this information it is important to understand the naive beliefs held by potential jurors about forensic science evidence reliability. It is these beliefs that will shape evaluations at trial. This descriptive study adds to our knowledge about naive beliefs by: 1) measuring jury-eligible (lay) perceptions of reliability for the largest range of forensic science disciplines to date, over three waves of data collection between 2011 and 2016 (n = 674); 2) calibrating reliability ratings with false positive report estimates; and 3) comparing lay reliability estimates with those of an opportunity sample of forensic practitioners (n = 53). Overall the data suggest that both jury-eligible participants and practitioners consider forensic evidence highly reliable. When compared to best or plausible estimates of reliability and error in the forensic sciences these views appear to overestimate reliability and underestimate the frequency of false positive errors. This result highlights the importance of collecting and disseminating empirically derived estimates of false positive error rates to ensure that practitioners and potential jurors have a realistic impression of the value of forensic science evidence.

Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability

2019 ◽  
Vol 302 ◽  
pp. 109877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristy A. Martire ◽  
Kaye N. Ballantyne ◽  
Agnes Bali ◽  
Gary Edmond ◽  
Richard I. Kemp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Science ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Positive Error ◽  
False Positive Error ◽  
Science Evidence

The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristy A. Martire ◽  
Richard I. Kemp ◽  
Ian Watkins ◽  
Malindi A. Sayle ◽  
Ben R. Newell
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Science ◽  
Evidence Strength ◽  
Weak Evidence ◽  
Science Evidence
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document