Applying the competency model to professional psychology education, training, and assessment: Mission bay and beyond.

2010 ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathi A. Borden ◽  
E. John McIlvried
Keyword(s):  
Professional Psychology ◽  
Competency Model ◽  
Psychology Education ◽  
Mission Bay ◽  
Education Training

scholarly journals Training Models in Professional Psychology Education (A Literature Review)

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-159
Author(s):  
Anrilia E. M. Ningdyah ◽  
Edward Helmes ◽  
Claire Thompson ◽  
Garry Kidd ◽  
Kenneth Mark Greenwood
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Foundation ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Training Model ◽  
Professional Psychology ◽  
Specific Training ◽  
Psychology Programs ◽  
Psychology Education ◽  
Training Models ◽  
Competency Based ◽  
Intense Debate

Intense debate on training models used in professional psychology education, including discussion on the specific training models most appropriate for educating future psychologists is far from finished. The authors reviewed articles discussing training models including results of empirical studies in professional psychology programs, which were published in several psychology journals databases (1949 to 2014). The authors have identified (a) the scientist-practitioner; (b) the practitioner model and its derivatives; (c) the clinical-scientist; and (d) the competency-based models. This article also outlines the historical development of each model and a consideration of the main principles espoused by each training model. It seems that discussion on the concept of training models and empirical studies on how these models are used in professional psychology programs outside the context of Western countries, is rare. Thus, this review could serve as a theoretical foundation for the implementation of a study aimed at filling the gap in the discussion of professional psychology program curricula, including the training models used, especially in other contexts than the Western.

Challenges to Professional Psychology Education in the 21st Century: Response to Peterson.

2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 801-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beth Kenkel ◽  
Patrick H. DeLeon ◽  
Judith E. N. Albino ◽  
Natalie Porter
Keyword(s):  
21St Century ◽  
Professional Psychology ◽  
Psychology Education
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document