Oppositional defiant and conduct disorders.

2008 ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald T. Brown ◽  
David O. Antonuccio ◽  
George J. DuPaul ◽  
Mary A. Fristad ◽  
Cheryl A. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conduct Disorders ◽  
Oppositional Defiant

Oppositional Defiant and Conduct Disorders: Issues to be Resolved for DSM-IV

1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
BENJAMIN B. LAHEY ◽  
ROLF LOEBER ◽  
HERBERT C. QUAY ◽  
PAUL J. FRICK ◽  
JAMES GRIMM
Keyword(s):  
Conduct Disorders ◽  
Oppositional Defiant ◽  
Dsm Iv

scholarly journals Fifty years of preventing and treating childhood behaviour disorders: a systematic review to inform policy and practice

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Waddell ◽  
Christine Schwartz ◽  
Caitlyn Andres ◽  
Jenny Lou Barican ◽  
Donna Yung
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Criminal Activity ◽  
Conduct Disorders ◽  
Psychosocial Treatment ◽  
Incredible Years ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Psychosocial Treatments ◽  
Oppositional Defiant ◽  
Prevention Programmes

QuestionOppositional defiant and conduct disorders (ODD and CD) start early and persist, incurring high individual and collective costs. To inform policy and practice, we therefore asked: What is the best available research evidence on preventing and treating these disorders?Study selection and analysisWe sought randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions addressing the prevention or treatment of behaviour problems in individuals aged 18 years or younger. Our criteria were tailored to identify higher-quality RCTs that were also relevant to policy and practice. We searched the CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases, updating our initial searches in May 2017. Thirty-seven RCTs met inclusion criteria—evaluating 15 prevention programmes, 8 psychosocial treatments and 5 medications. We then conducted narrative synthesis.FindingsFor prevention, 3 notable programmes reduced behavioural diagnoses: Classroom-Centered Intervention; Good Behavior Game; and Fast Track. Five other programmes reduced serious behaviour symptoms such as criminal activity. Prevention benefits were long term, up to 35 years. For psychosocial treatment, Incredible Years reduced behavioural diagnoses. Three other interventions reduced criminal activity. Psychosocial treatment benefits lasted from 1 to 8 years. While 4 medications reduced post-test symptoms, all caused important adverse events.ConclusionsConsiderable RCT evidence favours prevention.Clinical implicationsEffective prevention programmes should therefore be made widely available. Effective psychosocial treatments should also be provided for all children with ODD/CD. But medications should be a last resort given associated adverse events and given only short-term evidence of benefits. Policymakers and practitioners can help children and populations by acting on these findings.

Oppositional defiant and conduct disorders: Validation of the DSM-III-R and an alternative diagnostic option

1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary F. Russo ◽  
Rolf Loeber ◽  
Benjamin B. Lahey ◽  
Kate Keenan
Keyword(s):  
Conduct Disorders ◽  
Oppositional Defiant

Family Environment in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity, Oppositional Defiant and Conduct Disorders

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Rey ◽  
Garry Walter ◽  
Jon M. Plapp ◽  
Elise Denshire
Keyword(s):  
Conduct Disorder ◽  
Oppositional Defiant Disorder ◽  
Family Environment ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Conduct Disorders ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Oppositional Defiant ◽  
The Family

Objective: This study aims to ascertain whether there were differences in family environment among patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder. Method: The records of 233 patients, selected for high or low scores on a scale that taps ADHD symptoms, were reviewed by three clinicians who made DSM-IV diagnoses and rated the family environment with the Global Family Environment Scale (GFES). Self-report data obtained from the parent and child versions of the Child Behaviour Checklist were also used. The quality of the family environment was then compared between the various diagnostic groups. Results: A poorer family environment was associated with conduct disorder and oppositional defiant disorder and predicted a worse outcome (e.g. admission to a non-psychiatric institution, drug and alcohol abuse). Quality of the family environment did not vary according to ADHD diagnosis or gender. Conclusions: There seems to be no association between the quality of the family environment and a diagnosis of ADHD among referred adolescents. However, there is an association with conduct disorder. Interventions that improve family environment in the early years of life may prevent the development of conduct problems.

Efficacy of an individualized social competence training for children with Oppositional Defiant Disorders/Conduct Disorders

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Goertz-Dorten ◽  
Christina Benesch ◽  
Christopher Hautmann ◽  
Emel Berk-Pawlitzek ◽  
Martin Faber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Competence ◽  
Conduct Disorders ◽  
Oppositional Defiant ◽  
Competence Training

Disorders of Development

2014 ◽  
pp. 557-581
Author(s):  
V. Mark Durand
Keyword(s):  
Early Adulthood ◽  
Communication Disorders ◽  
Conduct Disorders ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Specific Learning Disorder ◽  
Oppositional Defiant ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Clinically Significant

Disorders of development include a range of disorders first evidenced in childhood. Although most disorders have their origins in childhood, a few fully express themselves before early adulthood. This chapter describes the nature, assessment, and treatment of the more common disorders that are revealed in a clinically significant way during a child’s developing years. The disorders of development affect a range of functioning from single skills deficits to more pervasive problems that negatively impact a child’s ability to function. Included is coverage of several disorders usually diagnosed first in infancy, childhood, or adolescence, including the neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, communication disorders, intellectual disability, and specific learning disorder) and the disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders (e.g., oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder). Recommendations for future research on the potential for advancing knowledge regarding spectrums within some of these disorders as well as recommendations for treatment are outlined.

Conduct Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder

2020 ◽  
pp. 166-190
Author(s):  
Ingrid Carla Brussier
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Conduct Disorder ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Oppositional Defiant Disorder ◽  
Conduct Disorders ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Therapy Options ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Oppositional Defiant ◽  
Biological Development

This chapter investigates the psychological, physiological, and social aspects of conduct disorder (CD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). These disorders are classified in the disruptive, impulse-control, and conduct disorders class in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013). This chapter will consider the symptoms of ODD and CD and their effect on a child's social and biological development. The most common consequences of the disorders will be discussed: for example, the risk for other psychopathologies, social adversities, delinquency, and aggression. These severe outcomes signal the need for therapy options for children and adolescents and the assessment of their efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document