History and Overview of the Scientific Jury Selection Process.

2007 ◽  
pp. 3-15
Author(s):  
Joel D. Lieberman ◽  
Bruce D. Sales
Keyword(s):  
Selection Process ◽  
Jury Selection

Doing Justice: Perceptions of Gender Neutrality in the Jury Selection Process

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Eigenberg ◽  
Karen McGuffee ◽  
Gale D. Iles ◽  
Tammy S. Garland
Keyword(s):  
Selection Process ◽  
Jury Selection ◽  
Justice Perceptions ◽  
Gender Neutrality

Jury Selection in the Post-Batson Era

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara O’Brien ◽  
Catherine M. Grosso
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Racial Discrimination ◽  
Racial Bias ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Jury Selection ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Psychological Mechanisms ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Supreme Court

In Batson v. Kentucky (1986), the US Supreme Court sought to eradicate racial discrimination in jury selection by prohibiting the exercise of peremptory strikes based on race. This chapter reviews the evidence that Batson has failed to protect jurors from race-based strikes and the reasons for this failure. The test for establishing racial discrimination set forth in Batson suffers from design flaws that make its enforcement difficult given common psychological mechanisms at work in the decision-making process and which may be exacerbated by the jury selection process itself. Batson seeks to remedy only intentional discrimination. Moreover, its capacity to ensure diverse juries is limited by the stages of jury selection that precede its application. Enforcing Batson effectively is critical to the system’s integrity, but no simple solutions exist to remedy the stubborn persistence of racial bias in jury selection. All of this suggests that measures are needed to strengthen Batson’s protections.

Is Jury Selection Fair? Perceptions of Race and the Jury Selection Process

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen McGuffee ◽  
Tammy S. Garland ◽  
Helen Eigenberg
Keyword(s):  
Selection Process ◽  
Jury Selection

A comparison of the United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UK-CAT) with a traditional admission selection process

2009 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishan Fernando ◽  
Gordon Prescott ◽  
Jennifer Cleland ◽  
Kathryn Greaves ◽  
Hamish McKenzie
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Aptitude Test ◽  
The United Kingdom
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document