The NEO Personality Inventory and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory in the forensic evaluation of sex offenders.

2004 ◽  
pp. 269-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory K. Lehne
Keyword(s):  
Sex Offenders ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Forensic Evaluation ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory

International Personality Item Pool-NEO Personality Inventory-60

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Maples-Keller ◽  
Rachel L. Williamson ◽  
Chelsea E. Sleep ◽  
Nathan T. Carter ◽  
W. Keith Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Item Pool ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Item

Development and Validation of the Faceted Inventory of the Five-Factor Model (FI-FFM)

Assessment ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Watson ◽  
Ericka Nus ◽  
Kevin D. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Validity Data ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Three Samples ◽  
Five Phases

The Faceted Inventory of the Five-Factor Model (FI-FFM) is a comprehensive hierarchical measure of personality. The FI-FFM was created across five phases of scale development. It includes five facets apiece for neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness; four facets within agreeableness; and three facets for openness. We present reliability and validity data obtained from three samples. The FI-FFM scales are internally consistent and highly stable over 2 weeks (retest rs ranged from .64 to .82, median r = .77). They show strong convergent and discriminant validity vis-à-vis the NEO, the Big Five Inventory, and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Moreover, self-ratings on the scales show moderate to strong agreement with corresponding ratings made by informants ( rs ranged from .26 to .66, median r = .42). Finally, in joint analyses with the NEO Personality Inventory–3, the FI-FFM neuroticism facet scales display significant incremental validity in predicting indicators of internalizing psychopathology.

The five‐factor personality model in applied settings

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itzhak Montag ◽  
Joseph Levin
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
The Other ◽  
Factor Solution ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Five Factors ◽  
Male Subjects ◽  
Female Subjects

Two studies of the Revised NEO‐Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) conducted on two different applicant samples (one consisting of 539 female subjects and the other consisting of 396 male subjects) are reported. Factor analysis of the female sample yielded a five‐factor solution, highly congruent with the factors presented by Costa, McCrae and Dye (1991). Results of the male data were less clear‐cut, yielding four to five factors which were moderately congruent with the American data. The combined male and female sample showed again high congruence coefficients. Various minor deviations in the location of the facet variables are discussed.

scholarly journals Modeling General, Specific, and Method Variance in Personality Measures: Results for ZKA-PQ and NEO-PI-R

Assessment ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 959-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Abad ◽  
Miguel A. Sorrel ◽  
Luis Francisco Garcia ◽  
Anton Aluja
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Response Styles ◽  
General Factor ◽  
Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Inventories ◽  
Method Factor ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory Revised ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Using Data

Contemporary models of personality assume a hierarchical structure in which broader traits contain narrower traits. Individual differences in response styles also constitute a source of score variance. In this study, the bifactor model is applied to separate these sources of variance for personality subscores. The procedure is illustrated using data for two personality inventories—NEO Personality Inventory–Revised and Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire. The inclusion of the acquiescence method factor generally improved the fit to acceptable levels for the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire, but not for the NEO Personality Inventory–Revised. This effect was higher in subscales where the number of direct and reverse items is not balanced. Loadings on the specific factors were usually smaller than the loadings on the general factor. In some cases, part of the variance was due to domains being different from the main one. This information is of particular interest to researchers as they can identify which subscale scores have more potential to increase predictive validity.

scholarly journals Low Openness on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory as a Risk Factor for Treatment-Resistant Depression

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e71964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michio Takahashi ◽  
Yukihiko Shirayama ◽  
Katsumasa Muneoka ◽  
Masatoshi Suzuki ◽  
Koichi Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Resistant Depression

Validating the NEO Personality Inventory using assessor's ratings

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Furnham ◽  
John Crump ◽  
Josh Whelan
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document