Using contradiction: Family treatment of child sexual abuse.

2001 ◽  
pp. 179-189
Author(s):  
Wendy Greenspun
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Child Sexual Abuse ◽  
Family Treatment

Malpractice & Negligence: State Supreme Courts Limit Therapists’ Duties to Third Parties

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-205
Author(s):  
Megan Cleary
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Child Sexual Abuse ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
State Supreme Courts ◽  
Recovered Memories ◽  
Supreme Courts ◽  
Repressed Memory ◽  
University Of Colorado

In recent years, the law in the area of recovered memories in child sexual abuse cases has developed rapidly. See J.K. Murray, “Repression, Memory & Suggestibility: A Call for Limitations on the Admissibility of Repressed Memory Testimony in Abuse Trials,” University of Colorado Law Review, 66 (1995): 477-522, at 479. Three cases have defined the scope of liability to third parties. The cases, decided within six months of each other, all involved lawsuits by third parties against therapists, based on treatment in which the patients recovered memories of sexual abuse. The New Hampshire Supreme Court, in Hungerford v. Jones, 722 A.2d 478 (N.H. 1998), allowed such a claim to survive, while the supreme courts in Iowa, in J.A.H. v. Wadle & Associates, 589 N.W.2d 256 (Iowa 1999), and California, in Eear v. Sills, 82 Cal. Rptr. 281 (1991), rejected lawsuits brought by nonpatients for professional liability.

Finkelhor's Precondition Model of child sexual abuse: A critique.

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-307
Author(s):  
Tony Ward ◽  
Stephen M. Hudson
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Child Sexual Abuse

Review of Accusations of Child Sexual Abuse.

1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1096-1096
Author(s):  
Marilyn T. Erickson
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Child Sexual Abuse

Identifying and Reporting Child Sexual Abuse

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Finlayson ◽  
G. P. Koocher
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Child Sexual Abuse
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document