Discrepancies between self-reported and observed function: Contributions of response shift.

2000 ◽  
pp. 189-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawren H. Daltroy ◽  
Holley M. Eaton ◽  
Charlotte B. Phillips ◽  
Matthew H. Liang
Keyword(s):  
Response Shift

scholarly journals Correction to: Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: definition, theory, and a revised model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Vanier ◽  
◽  
Frans J. Oort ◽  
Leah McClimans ◽  
Nikki Ow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Response Shift ◽  
Patient Reported

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02890-6

scholarly journals Response shift after coronary revascularization

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom H. Oreel ◽  
Pythia T. Nieuwkerk ◽  
Iris D. Hartog ◽  
Justine E. Netjes ◽  
Alexander B. A. Vonk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Life Story ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Response Shift ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
New York Heart Association

Abstract Purpose The aims of this study were to investigate (1) the extent to which response shift occurs among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after coronary revascularization, (2) whether the assessment of changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), controlled for response shift, yield more valid estimates of changes in HRQoL, as indicated by stronger associations with criterion measures of change, than without controlling for response shift, and (3) if occurrences of response shift are related to patient characteristics. Methods Patients with CAD completed the SF-36 and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ7) at baseline and 3 months after coronary revascularization. Sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial variables were measured with the patient version of the New York Heart Association-class, Subjective Significance Questionnaire, Reconstruction of Life Events Questionnaire (RE-LIFE), and HEXACO personality inventory. Oort’s Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach was used to investigate response shift. Results 191 patient completed questionnaires at baseline and at 3 months after treatment. The SF-36 showed recalibration and reprioritization response shift and the SAQ7 reconceptualization response shift. Controlling for these response shift effects did not result in more valid estimates of change. One significant association was found between reprioritization response shift and complete integration of having CAD into their life story, as indicated by the RE-LIFE. Conclusion Results indicate response shift in HRQoL following coronary revascularization. While we did not find an impact of response shift on the estimates of change, the SEM approach provides a more comprehensive insight into the different types of change in HRQoL following coronary revascularization.

Quality of life change and response shift in patients admitted to palliative care units: a pilot study

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Echteld ◽  
Luc Deliens ◽  
Marcel E Ooms ◽  
Miel W Ribbe ◽  
Gerrit van der Wal
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Response Shift ◽  
Life Change ◽  
Palliative Care Units

Response-Shift Bias

1980 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
George S. Howard
Keyword(s):  
Response Shift ◽  
Response Shift Bias

Response-Style Effects, Response-Shift Bias, and a Bogus-Pipeline: A Replication

1988 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjam Sprangers ◽  
Johan Hoogstraten
Keyword(s):  
Response Shift ◽  
Instructional Film ◽  
First Aid ◽  
Study Data ◽  
The Self ◽  
Response Style ◽  
Educational Training ◽  
Bogus Pipeline ◽  
Experimental Training ◽  
Response Shift Bias

In an earlier study by Sprangers and Hoogstraten, a bogus-pipeline induction did remove response-style effects in the self-reported pretest. Response-shift bias, defined as a significant mean difference between conventional pre- and retrospective preratings, was consequently eliminated. It was concluded that response-style effects in the pretesting are a likely cause of response-shift bias. The present experiment was designed to examine whether these results are stable and generalizable to a different educational training. The present replication made use of the same bogus-pipeline procedure. The experimental training was a First Aid instructional film. Subjects were 53 freshmen in psychology who were fulfilling a course requirement. Contrary to expectation, a bogus-pipeline induction did not lower self-reported preratings. A response-shift did not occur in the bogus-pipeline or in the non-bogus-pipeline conditions. It was concluded that a construct not susceptible to removal of response-style effects is not susceptible to response-shift bias either. Results are consonant with the response-style basis for response-shift bias and show no contradiction of the former study. Data furthermore show that the administration of an objective pretest had no effect on subsequent objective posttreatment scores.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document