Review of Biological Psychology. 2nd ed.

1984 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 918-918
Author(s):  
Gerald S Wasserman
Keyword(s):  
Biological Psychology

scholarly journals Illusory essences: A bias holding back theorizing in psychological science

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron Brick ◽  
Bruce Hood ◽  
Vebjørn Ekroll ◽  
Lee de-Wit
Keyword(s):  
Biological Psychology ◽  
Theory Development ◽  
Psychological Research ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Complex Phenomenon ◽  
Psychological Science ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Category Labels ◽  
Vital Forces ◽  
Holding Back

The reliance in psychology on verbal definitions means that psychological research is unusually moored to how humans think and communicate about categories. Psychological concepts (e.g., intelligence; attention) are easily assumed to represent objective, definable categories with an underlying essence. Like the 'vital forces' previously thought to animate life, these assumed essences can create an illusion of understanding. We describe a pervasive tendency across psychological science to assume that essences explain phenomena by synthesizing a wide range of research lines from cognitive, clinical, and biological psychology and neuroscience. Labeling a complex phenomenon can appear as theoretical progress before sufficient evidence that the described category has a definable essence or known boundary conditions. Category labels can further undermine progress by masking contingent and contextual relationships and obscuring the need to specify mechanisms. Finally, we highlight examples of promising methods that circumvent the lure of essences and we suggest four concrete strategies to identify and avoid essentialist intuitions in theory development.

Biological psychology.

2000 ◽  
pp. 420-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Rosenzweig
Keyword(s):  
Biological Psychology

Biological psychology.

1962 ◽  
pp. 158-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. T. Diamond ◽  
K. L. Chow
Keyword(s):  
Biological Psychology
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document