Review of Art and Human Intelligence.

1966 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 317-317
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  
Human Intelligence

Human Intelligence Investigated

1973 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 416-417
Author(s):  
MARJORIE P. HONZIK
Keyword(s):  
Human Intelligence

Macrophage+: a Game With a Purpose for Applying Human Intelligence in Control Mechanisms

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Ali Tarihi ◽  
Hassan Haghighi ◽  
Fereidoon Shams Aliee ◽  
Amirmehdi Setarenejad
Keyword(s):  
Human Intelligence ◽  
Control Mechanisms

Intelligence, Artificial and Otherwise

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-258
Author(s):  
Paul Dumouchel
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Human Intelligence

The idea of artificial intelligence implies the existence of a form of intelligence that is “natural,” or at least not artificial. The problem is that intelligence, whether “natural” or “artificial,” is not well defined: it is hard to say what, exactly, is or constitutes intelligence. This difficulty makes it impossible to measure human intelligence against artificial intelligence on a unique scale. It does not, however, prevent us from comparing them; rather, it changes the sense and meaning of such comparisons. Comparing artificial intelligence with human intelligence could allow us to understand both forms better. This paper thus aims to compare and distinguish these two forms of intelligence, focusing on three issues: forms of embodiment, autonomy and judgment. Doing so, I argue, should enable us to have a better view of the promises and limitations of present-day artificial intelligence, along with its benefits and dangers and the place we should make for it in our culture and society.

Intelligence and Intelligibility

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. R. Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
Social Groups ◽  
Human Experience ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Human Intelligence ◽  
Cognitive Capacities ◽  
Nature And Culture ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Intellectual Disciplines

This study investigates the tension between two conflicting intuitions, our twin recognitions: (1) that all humans share the same basic cognitive capacities; and yet (2) their actual manifestations in different individuals and groups differ appreciably. How can we reconcile our sense of what links us all as humans with our recognition of these deep differences? All humans use language and live in social groups, where we have to probe what is distinctive in the experience of humans as opposed to that of other animals and how the former may have evolved from the latter. Moreover, the languages we speak and the societies we form differ profoundly, though the conclusion that we are the prisoners of our own particular experience should and can be resisted. The study calls into question the cross-cultural viability both of many of the analytic tools we commonly use (such as the contrast between the literal and the metaphorical, between myth and rational account, and between nature and culture) and of our usual categories for organizing human experience and classifying intellectual disciplines, mathematics, religion, law, and aesthetics. The result is a robust defence of the possibilities of mutual intelligibility while recognizing both the diversity in the manifestations of human intelligence and the need to revise our assumptions in order to achieve that understanding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document