POLISH PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN

1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
JOSEF BROŽEK
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Bulletin

Psychological Bulletin: Editor.

2003 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. C2-C2
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Bulletin

Psychological Bulletin: Instructions to authors.

2003 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 474-474
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Bulletin

Psychological Bulletin: Instructions to authors.

2003 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-338
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Bulletin

scholarly journals Estimates of Between-Study Heterogeneity for 705 Meta-Analyses Reported in Psychological Bulletin From 1990–2013

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Van Erp ◽  
Josine Verhagen ◽  
Raoul P. P. P. Grasman ◽  
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Bulletin ◽  
Study Heterogeneity ◽  
Meta Analyses

"Getting in" revisited: An analysis of manuscript characteristics, reviewers' ratings, and acceptance of manuscripts in Psychological Bulletin.

2002 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 997-1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Eisenberg ◽  
Marilyn S. Thompson ◽  
Susan Augir ◽  
Elizabeth Harris Stanley
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Bulletin

Implementing a General Framework for Assessing Interrater Agreement in Stata

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Klein
Keyword(s):  
General Framework ◽  
Missing Values ◽  
Kappa Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Agreement ◽  
Psychological Bulletin ◽  
Psychological Measurement ◽  
Statistical Software ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Software Packages

Despite its well-known weaknesses, researchers continuously choose the kappa coefficient (Cohen, 1960, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37–46; Fleiss, 1971, Psychological Bulletin 76: 378–382) to quantify agreement among raters. Part of kappa's persistent popularity seems to arise from a lack of available alternative agreement coefficients in statistical software packages such as Stata. In this article, I review Gwet’s (2014, Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability) recently developed framework of interrater agreement coefficients. This framework extends several agreement coefficients to handle any number of raters, any number of rating categories, any level of measurement, and missing values. I introduce the kappaetc command, which implements this framework in Stata.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document