Future directions in theory, research, practice, and policy.

2019 ◽  
pp. 709-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick H. DeLeon ◽  
Fernanda P. De Oliveira ◽  
Antonio E. Puente
2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S50-S57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan M. Steinberg ◽  
Robert S. Pynoos ◽  
Ernestine C. Briggs ◽  
Ellen T. Gerrity ◽  
Christopher M. Layne ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer McDonald ◽  
Rebecca Merkley ◽  
Jacqueline Mickle ◽  
Lisa Collimore ◽  
Daniel Ansari

Research in cognitive development has highlighted that early numeracy skills are associated with later math achievement, suggesting that these skills should be targeted in early math education. Here we tested whether tools used by researchers to assess mathematical thinking could be useful in the classroom. This paper describes a collaborative project between cognitive scientists and school board researchers/educators implementing numeracy screeners with kindergarten students over the course of three school years. The Give-A-Number task (Wynn, 1990) was used with first-year kindergarten students and the Numeracy Screener [BLINDED] with second-year kindergarten students. Results indicated that educators (N = 59) found the tools feasible to implement and helpful for exploring their students’ thinking and targeting instruction. The Educators’ feedback also helped inform improvements to the implementation of the tools and future directions for both the schools and the researchers. This work emphasizes the importance of transdisciplinary collaboration to address the research-practice gap.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Brambilla ◽  
Simona Sacchi ◽  
Patrice Rusconi ◽  
Geoffrey P. Goodwin

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren M. Little ◽  
Kristen A. Pickett ◽  
Rachel Proffitt ◽  
Jana Cason

The use of telehealth to deliver occupational therapy services rapidly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic. There are frameworks to evaluate services delivered through telehealth; however, none are specific to occupational therapy. Therefore, occupational therapy would benefit from a framework to systematically evaluate components of telehealth service delivery and build evidence to demonstrate the distinct value of occupational therapy.  The PACE Framework outlines four priority domains to address areas of need: (1) Population and Health Outcomes; (2) Access for All Clients; (3) Costs and Cost Effectiveness; and (4) Experiences of Clients and Occupational Therapy Practitioners. This article describes the development and expert reviewer evaluation of the PACE Framework. In addition, the PACE Framework’s domains, subdomains, and outcome measure examples are described along with future directions for implementation in occupational therapy research, practice, and program evaluation. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 1053-1075
Author(s):  
Brett L. M. Levy ◽  
Alandeom W. Oliveira ◽  
Cornelia B. Harris

Author(s):  
Louis G. Castonguay ◽  
Michael J. Constantino ◽  
Henry Xiao

This chapter reviews efforts to integrate psychotherapy research and practice through collaboration and information-sharing within naturalistic clinical settings. Specifically, the chapter focuses on three types of practice-oriented research that capitalize on the bidirectional partnership between researchers and practitioners: (1) patient-focused, (2) practice-based, and (3) practice-research networks. The authors provide examples of each type of integration, highlighting the ways in which the research is different, yet complementary to more traditional studies conducted in controlled settings. They submit that the researcher–practitioner partnership in an ecologically valid treatment context represents an optimal means to reduce the pervasive research–practice chasm and to promote genuine integration for enhancing the effectiveness and personalization of psychotherapy. The chapter also discusses future directions in this vein.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document