scholarly journals Dyadic effects of gender minority stressors in substance use behaviors among transgender women and their non-transgender male partners.

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sari L. Reisner ◽  
Kristi E. Gamarel ◽  
Tooru Nemoto ◽  
Don Operario
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi E. Gamarel ◽  
Sari L. Reisner ◽  
Jean-Philippe Laurenceau ◽  
Tooru Nemoto ◽  
Don Operario

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henna Budhwani ◽  
Kristine R. Hearld ◽  
Seyram A. Butame ◽  
Sylvie Naar ◽  
Leandro Tapia ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 100146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike C. Parent ◽  
Andrew S. Arriaga ◽  
Teresa Gobble ◽  
Lexie Wille

AIDS Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 1506-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiffer G. Card ◽  
Anabelle Bernard Fournier ◽  
Justin T. Sorge ◽  
Jeffrey Morgan ◽  
Daniel Grace ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. L. Lee ◽  
Bonnie E. Shook-Sa ◽  
Jeffrey Gilbert ◽  
Leah M. Ranney ◽  
Adam O. Goldstein ◽  
...  

Background. There are well-documented inequities in smoking between sexual and gender minority (SGM; e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender [LGBT]) and straight and cisgender people. However, there is less information about risk for and resilience against smoking among SGM people. Such information is critical for understanding etiology and developing interventions. Aims. To conduct a within-group assessment of risks and resiliencies relating to smoking status. Method. In 2017, we conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey with a national, probability-based sample of SGM adults ( N = 453). We assessed theory-informed risks (adverse childhood events, substance use–oriented social environment, mental distress, stigma, discrimination, social isolation, and identity concealment) and resiliencies (advertising skepticism, identity centrality, social support, and SGM community participation). We applied survey weights, standardized predictor variables, and fit logistic regression models predicting smoking status. We stratified by age and SGM identity. Results. Patterns of risk and resilience differ by age and identity. Effects were consistently in the same direction for all groups for participating in substance use–oriented social environments, pointing to a potential risk factor for all groups. Advertising skepticism and having people you can talk to about being LGBTQ were potential protective factors. Discussion. Intervention development should address risk and resilience that differs by SGM identity. Additionally, our findings suggest interventionists should consider theoretical frameworks beyond minority stress. Conclusion. While much of the literature has focused on the role of stress from stigma and discrimination in tobacco use, addressing social norms and bolstering protective factors may also be important in SGM-targeted interventions.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas C. Heck ◽  
Kristi E. Gamarel ◽  
Tooru Nemoto ◽  
Don Operario

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document