Seismic Anisotropy, Flow, and Constitution of the Upper Mantle

Author(s):  
Neville L. Carter ◽  
David W. Baker ◽  
Richard P. George
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric P. Legendre ◽  
Li Zhao ◽  
Tai-Lin Tseng

AbstractThe average anisotropy beneath Anatolia is very strong and is well constrained by shear-wave splitting measurements. However, the vertical layering of anisotropy and the contribution of each layer to the overall pattern is still an open question. Here, we construct anisotropic phase-velocity maps of fundamental-mode Rayleigh waves for the Anatolia region using ambient noise seismology and records from several regional seismic stations. We find that the anisotropy patterns in the crust, lithosphere and asthenosphere beneath Anatolia have limited amplitudes and are generally consistent with regional tectonics and mantle processes dominated by the collision between Eurasia and Arabia and the Aegean/Anatolian subduction system. The anisotropy of these layers in the crust and upper mantle are, however, not consistent with the strong average anisotropy measured in this area. We therefore suggest that the main contribution to overall anisotropy likely originates from a deep and highly anisotropic region round the mantle transition zone.


2018 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. 535-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhui Ju ◽  
Junmeng Zhao ◽  
Ning Huang ◽  
Qiang Xu ◽  
Hongbing Liu

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Margheriti ◽  
C. Nostro ◽  
A. Amato ◽  
M. Cocco

Anisotropy is a common property of the Earth's crust and the upper mantle; it is related to the strain field of the medium and therefore to geodynamics. In this paper we describe the different possible origins of anisotropic behavior of the seismic waves and the seismological techniques used to define anisotropic bodies. In general it is found that the fast polarization direction is parallel to the absolute plate motion in cratonic areas, to the spreading direction near rifts or extensional zones, and to the main structural features in transpressive regimes. The delay times between fast and slow waves reflect the relative strength and penetration at depth of the deformation field. The correspondence between surface structural trends and anisotropy in the upper mantle, found in many regions of the world, strongly suggest that orogenic processes involve not only the shallow crust but the entire lithosphere. Recently in Italy both shear wave splitting analysis and Pn inversion were applied to define the trend of seismic anisotropy. Along the Northern Appeninic arc fast directions follow the strike of the arc (i.e., parallel to the strike of the Miocene-Pleistocene compressional features), whereas in the Tyrrhenian zone fast directions are about E-W SW-NE; parallel to the post-Miocene extension that is thought to have reoriented the mantle minerals fabric in the astenosphere.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim Levin ◽  
et al.

Data sources, details of data analysis methodology, and additional diagrams and maps of shear wave splitting measurements.<br>


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (28) ◽  
pp. eabb0476
Author(s):  
Jorge C. Castellanos ◽  
Jonathan Perry-Houts ◽  
Robert W. Clayton ◽  
YoungHee Kim ◽  
A. Christian Stanciu ◽  
...  

Buoyancy anomalies within Earth’s mantle create large convective currents that are thought to control the evolution of the lithosphere. While tectonic plate motions provide evidence for this relation, the mechanism by which mantle processes influence near-surface tectonics remains elusive. Here, we present an azimuthal anisotropy model for the Pacific Northwest crust that strongly correlates with high-velocity structures in the underlying mantle but shows no association with the regional mantle flow field. We suggest that the crustal anisotropy is decoupled from horizontal basal tractions and, instead, created by upper mantle vertical loading, which generates pressure gradients that drive channelized flow in the mid-lower crust. We then demonstrate the interplay between mantle heterogeneities and lithosphere dynamics by predicting the viscous crustal flow that is driven by local buoyancy sources within the upper mantle. Our findings reveal how mantle vertical load distribution can actively control crustal deformation on a scale of several hundred kilometers.


Geology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim Levin ◽  
Stephen Elkington ◽  
James Bourke ◽  
Ivonne Arroyo ◽  
Lepolt Linkimer

Abstract Surrounded by subducting slabs and continental keels, the upper mantle of the Pacific is largely prevented from mixing with surrounding areas. One possible outlet is beneath the southern part of the Central American isthmus, where regional observations of seismic anisotropy, temporal changes in isotopic composition of volcanic eruptions, and considerations of dynamic topography all suggest upper mantle flow from the Pacific to the Caribbean. We derive new constraints on the nature of seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle of southern Costa Rica from observations of birefringence in teleseismic shear waves. Fast and slow components separate by ∼1 s, with faster waves polarized along the 40°–50° (northeast) direction, near-orthogonally to the Central American convergent margin. Our results are consistent with upper mantle flow from the Pacific to the Caribbean and require an opening in the lithosphere subducting under the region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document