Production and fate of phytoplankton: Annual cycles and interannual variability

Author(s):  
Lawrence W. Harding ◽  
Danilo Degobbis ◽  
Robert Precali
2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 10289-10330 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Greuell ◽  
J. C. M. Andersson ◽  
C. Donnelly ◽  
L. Feyen ◽  
D. Gerten ◽  
...  

Abstract. The main aims of this paper are the evaluation of five large-scale hydrological models across Europe and the assessment of the suitability of the models for making projections under climate change. For the evaluation, 22 years of discharge measurements from 46 large catchments were exploited. In the reference simulations forcing was taken from the E-OBS dataset for precipitation and temperature, and from the WFDEI dataset for other variables. On average across all catchments, biases were small for four of the models, ranging between −29 and +23 mm yr−1 (−9 and +8 %), while one model produced a large negative bias (−117 mm yr−1; −38 %). Despite large differences in e.g. the evapotranspiration schemes, the skill to simulate interannual variability did not differ much between the models, which can be ascribed to the dominant effect of interannual variation in precipitation on interannual variation in discharge. Assuming that the skill of a model to simulate interannual variability provides a measure for the model's ability to make projections under climate change, the skill of future discharge projections will not differ much between models. The quality of the simulation of the mean annual cycles, and low and high discharge was found to be related to the degree of calibration of the models, with the more calibrated models outperforming the crudely and non-calibrated models. The sensitivity to forcing was investigated by carrying out alternative simulations with all forcing variables from WFDEI, which increased biases by between +66 and +85 mm yr−1 (21–28 %), significantly changed the inter-model ranking of the skill to simulate the mean and increased the magnitude of interannual variability by 28 %, on average.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2965-2988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine D. Zaba ◽  
Daniel L. Rudnick ◽  
Bruce D. Cornuelle ◽  
Ganesh Gopalakrishnan ◽  
Matthew R. Mazloff

AbstractA data-constrained state estimate of the southern California Current System (CCS) is presented and compared with withheld California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) data and assimilated glider data over 2007–17. The objective of this comparison is to assess the ability of the California State Estimate (CASE) to reproduce the key physical features of the CCS mean state, annual cycles, and interannual variability along the three sections of the California Underwater Glider Network (CUGN). The assessment focuses on several oceanic metrics deemed most important for characterizing physical variability in the CCS: 50-m potential temperature, 80-m salinity, and 26 kg m−3 isopycnal depth and salinity. In the time mean, the CASE reproduces large-scale thermohaline and circulation structures, including observed temperature gradients, shoaling isopycnals, and the locations and magnitudes of the equatorward California Current and poleward California Undercurrent. With respect to the annual cycle, the CASE captures the phase and, to a lesser extent, the magnitude of upper-ocean warming and stratification from late summer to early fall and of isopycnal heave during springtime upwelling. The CASE also realistically captures near-surface diapycnal mixing during upwelling season and the semiannual cycle of the California Undercurrent. In terms of interannual variability, the most pronounced signals are the persistent warming and downwelling anomalies of 2014–16 and a positive isopycnal salinity anomaly that peaked with the 2015–16 El Niño.


2000 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 2536-2546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Petrie ◽  
Philip Yeats

Nitrate, silicate, and phosphate observations are used to determine their annual cycles for the Scotian Shelf and the Gulf of Maine. Concentrations increase from fall through winter, decrease rapidly at shallow depths in late winter, and remain at low levels through spring and summer. Deep layers exhibit a weak annual cycle with highest concentrations in summer. Winter nitrate concentrations (depth [Formula: see text] 50 m) are highest on the eastern Scotian Shelf, decreasing southwestwards into the Gulf of Maine. The Gulf of St. Lawrence is the primary source of nitrate (9300 mol· s-1) and silicate (7680 mol·s-1) during winter for the Scotian Shelf; in spring and summer, vertical diffusive fluxes, 1500-1000 mol·s-1 for the central Scotian Shelf, are as large as the horizontal advective ones and can provide the entire nitrate requirement. The 50-m vertical diffusive fluxes of nitrate and silicate vary by a factor of 4 in the Scotian Shelf - Gulf of Maine region. The interannual variability of nitrate and dissolved oxygen on the Scotian Shelf are coupled to water mass changes, with low (high) nitrate and high (low) dissolved oxygen concentrations corresponding to the dominance of Labrador (Warm) Slope water.


Tellus B ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rödenbeck ◽  
C. Le Quéré ◽  
M. Heimann ◽  
R. F. Keeling

Tellus B ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret S. Torn ◽  
Sebastien C. Biraud ◽  
Christopher J. Still ◽  
William J. Riley ◽  
Joe A. Berry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document